Search Results for "Maharashtra Police Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Police Rules"

2661 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2661 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Order Treating Suspension Period as Suspension After Acquittal. Rule 72 of Maharashtra Police (Punishment and Appeals) Rules, 1956 permits treating suspension period as suspension if authority assigns sufficient reasons, and Tribunal's order was not perverse.

15 Feb 2005

The petitioner, Shri Bhagwan Namdeo Rane, was a police employee in the State of Maharashtra. He was prosecuted for certain offences and, as a result, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes MAT Order Reinstating Police Officer in Writ Petition by Complainant Lawyer — Suspension Revocation Set Aside Due to Non-Compliance with Maharashtra Police (Punishment and Appeals) Rules, 1956 and Lack of Review Committee Recommendation. The High Court held that the MAT failed to consider mandatory statutory requirements under Rule 4(4) of the 1956 Rules, and the State Government's revocation order was based on a non-existent Review Committee recommendation.

18 Aug 2022

The petitioner, a lawyer, filed a complaint against Respondent No. 1, a Superintendent of Police, alleging personal misconduct. Based on the complaint...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Police Personnel Challenging Refusal to Permit Formation of Association, Holding Restriction Valid Under Article 33(b) and Police Forces (Restriction of Rights) Act, 1966. Denial of Permission Not Violative of Article 19(1)(c) as Prior Sanction Requirement Fulfills Constitutional Safeguards and Alternative Grievance Mechanisms Exist.

16 Sep 2016

The case involved a writ petition under Article 226 filed by five police personnel from various lower ranks (Police Sub Inspector, Police Naik, Assist...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Compassionate Appointment to Ward of Police Constable Retired on Medical Grounds Under 2006 Rules. Rule 3(2)(D) of Maharashtra Police Constables (Recruitment) Rules, 2006 provides direct appointment without test for wards of employees retired on medical grounds.

9 Dec 2013

The petitioner, Ganesh Bhimrao Munjal, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal dismissing his Original ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Police Patil Under Prevention of Corruption Act — Police Patil Not a Public Servant Under Section 2(c) of the Act. Petitioner appointed under Maharashtra Village Police Act, 1967 held not to be a public servant within meaning of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

16 Mar 2017

The petitioner, Atul Ramdas Dabare, was appointed as a Police Patil under the Maharashtra Village Police Act, 1967. An FIR was registered against him ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Additional Commissioner's Order and Restores Removal of Police Patil for Engaging in Political Activities. Police Patil, a Government Servant Holding a Civil Post Under the Maharashtra Village Police Act, 1967, Violated Rule 5 of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1979 by Contesting Elections and Actively Participating in Politics.

9 Apr 2012

The writ petition arose from a service dispute involving the removal of a Police Patil for engaging in political activities. The petitioner, a residen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Characterizing Order Under Section 60 of Maharashtra Police Act as Administrative; Petition to be Heard by Division Bench. The Division Bench Rules That Externment Appeal Order Does Not Involve Quasi-Judicial Determination and Thus Falls Outside 'Order' Under Rule 18 of Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960.

15 Sep 2016

The case arose from a Criminal Writ Petition filed by the petitioner challenging an externment order and the subsequent appellate order confirming the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Declares Arrest Illegal for Non-Compliance with Article 22(1) and Section 50 Cr.P.C. — Failure to Communicate Grounds of Arrest in Writing Renders Arrest and Subsequent Remand Void. The court held that the constitutional mandate under Article 22(1) requires grounds of arrest to be communicated in writing, and oral communication is insufficient, vitiating the arrest and all subsequent remand orders.

18 Jul 2024

The petitioner was arrested on 22 February 2024 in connection with C.R. No.68 of 2020 registered at Malad Police Station for offences under Sections 4...

High Court

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION Nos. 452

14 Aug 2014

Multiple writ petitions and a criminal application were filed before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging police actions of raiding or sto...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Demand and Acceptance Evidence. Court Upholds Trial Court's Finding That Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

22 Oct 2024

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Prakash Pandharinath Rajput, a Police Sub-Inspector, who was charged with demanding and acc...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)