Search Results for "Maharashtra Entertainment Duty Act"

134 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 134 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Entertainment Duty on Award Function with Intermittent Performances. Sponsorship Amount for Invitee-Only Event Constitutes Payment for Admission Under Maharashtra Entertainments Duty Act.

The petitioner, a company incorporated under Section 25 of the Companies Act, 1956, organized the 'APSARA' award function on 21st January 2006 at Jams...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner Club to Permit Mobile Phone Usage at Race Courses Without Additional Entertainment Duty. The Court held that mobile phone use is not entertainment under the Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923, and no additional duty is leviable.

The petitioner, The Royal Western India Turf Club Ltd., conducts horse races in Mumbai and Pune under a license from the State of Maharashtra under th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Members' Club Against Entertainment Duty Demand on Billiards Tables. Principle of Mutuality and Absence of Admission Fee Render Levy Under Section 3 of Maharashtra Entertainments Duty Act, 1963 Inapplicable.

The petitioner, Gondwana Club, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, challenged the proceedings initiated by the Entertainment Ta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Entertainment Tax Demand Against Charity Show Organizer. Show for Blind Held Exempt Under Section 7 of Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923; Recovery Barred by Limitation.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions challenging a common order/action by the State of Maharashtra to recover entertainment duty from the organize...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Entertainment Tax Exemption for IPL Matches — State Government's Policy Decision Not Interfered With. Policy Decision on Tax Exemption Upheld as Not Arbitrary Under Bombay Entertainment Duty Act, 1923.

The petitioner, a sitting Member of the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the propriety of the decision...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Entertainment Duty on Amusement Park Admission Fee. Lumpsum Charge for Entry and Entertainment is Subject to Duty Under Bombay Entertainment Duty Act, 1923.

The petitioners, Pan India Paryatan Limited and its director, owned and operated an amusement park in Greater Bombay which opened to the public on 25t...