Search Results for "KIADB Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "KIADB Act"

221 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 221 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging TDS Deduction on Land Acquisition Compensation — Holds That KIADB Is Not a 'Public Sector Company' Under Section 194LA of Income Tax Act, 1961. Statutory Board Cannot Deduct TDS on Compensation Paid for Land Acquisition as It Is Not a Company Incorporated Under Companies Act.

2 Aug 2022

The petitioner, M/s. Hegde and Golay Pvt Ltd, a company whose land was acquired by the Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board (KIADB) for a metro...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions on Lapse of Acquisition Under KIAD Act Due to Non-Passing of Award. Petitioners, Subsequent Purchasers, Argue Absence of Statutory Time Limit Does Not Allow Indefinite Delay, While Respondents Contend Delay Caused by Petitioners' Own Litigation and Interim Orders.

7 Mar 2019

The writ petitioners, subsequent purchasers of lands measuring 16 acres 4.25 guntas in Amani Bellandur Khane Village, challenged the acquisition proce...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications Under KIAD Act — Section 24 of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 Not Applicable. Land Acquisition for Industrial Development Under KIAD Act, 1966 Held Not Governed by the 2013 Act, and Notifications Do Not Lapse.

17 Aug 2017

The petitioners, landowners in Belagola village, Srirangapattana taluk, Mandya district, challenged the preliminary notification dated 15.09.2000 issu...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Acquisition Notifications for Lack of Public Purpose and Non-Compliance with KIADB Act. Acquisition for Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board fails as the Board is not an industrial concern under Section 2(7) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966.

15 Dec 2016

The petitioners, owners of agricultural lands in Amani Bellandur Khane Village, Varthur Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, challenged the preliminary notifi...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Disposes of Writ Petition Challenging Demolition Order and Clarifies Building Plan Sanctioning Authority in KIADB Industrial Areas. Government Order Issued Pursuant to Court Direction Confirms KIADB as Authority After Sale Deed Execution.

27 Sep 2024

The petitioner, proprietor of Vishnu Hotel, constructed a hotel on a plot in Bommasandra Industrial Area allotted by the Karnataka Industrial Areas De...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition as Withdrawn in KIADB Land Acquisition Challenge. Petitioner Sought Withdrawal of Petition Challenging Notifications Under KIADB Act, 1966, and Court Allowed Withdrawal Without Adjudication on Merits.

6 Jul 2020

In the High Court of Karnataka, a writ petition was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by a landowner challenging acquisiti...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Appeal Against Single Judge's Dismissal of Land Acquisition Challenge. The Division Bench considered whether the dismissal of the writ petition on grounds of delay and laches was justified under the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966.

3 Jan 2023

The appeal arises from the dismissal of a writ petition that challenged land acquisition notifications issued under the Karnataka Industrial Areas Dev...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Industrial Development — Petitioners Failed to Show Violation of Statutory Provisions. The Court held that the acquisition under the KIAD Act, 1966 was valid and the petitioners were not entitled to higher compensation as they had already received enhanced compensation under a consent award.

3 Jun 2019

The petitioners, Smt. Kempamma and others, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the acquisition of...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Government's Decision to Drop Land Acquisition Under KIAD Act. Notification Dropping Acquisition Not Arbitrary Despite Perverse Delegate Report and Absence of Hearing, as Government Must Independently Satisfy Itself Under Section 28(4) of Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966.

26 Feb 2015

The High Court of Karnataka dismissed a writ petition filed by M/s. Nandi Engineering (Pvt) Ltd., a company that sought to quash a notification droppi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Lapse of Land Acquisition Under Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act. Petitioners Claimed Acquisition Lapsed Due to Non-Payment of Compensation and Non-Passing of Award Under Section 24(2) of 2013 Act and Section 11A of 1894 Act.

9 Jan 2018

The matter involved a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India filed by landowners whose agricultural lands in Mahajenaha...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)