Search Results for "KIAD Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "KIAD Act"

20 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 20 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses IDBI Bank's Appeal Against KIADB's Cancellation of Land Allotment for Non-Compliance with Allotment Conditions. The Court held that the allotment letter did not create any vested right in the appellant and that the KIADB was justified in cancelling the allotment due to the appellant's failure to pay the balance consideration and execute the lease-cum-sale agreement within the stipulated time.

28 Apr 2026

The appellant, IDBI Bank Limited, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Karnataka challenging the communication dated 20.12.2022 issued by th...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Allotment Under KIAD Act, Upholding Allotment to Highest Bidder. Petitioner's Claim to Land as Successor to Mining Lease Rejected as Previous Court Orders Concluded Against It and Allotment Was Lawful Under Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966.

24 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by M/s Katwa Udyog Limited (KUL) challenging the allotment of land measuring 305 acres and 7 guntas at Na...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by GPA Holder in Land Acquisition Case — No Locus Standi to Challenge Acquisition Under KIAD Act. The Court held that a GPA holder cannot maintain a writ petition challenging land acquisition under the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966, as he has no independent right and the owner had already received compensation.

3 Dec 2025

The case involves a writ appeal filed by Jemcy Ponnappa C.P. and Casuba Infrastructure and Development Company against the State of Karnataka and othe...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petitions Declaring Income Tax Exemption Under Section 96 of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 Applicable to Land Acquisitions Under KIAD Act, 1966. Compensation for Land Acquisition Under State Act Entitled to Same Tax Exemption as Under Central Act.

21 Apr 2022

The petitioners, M/s Sri Balaji Corporate Services and NCC Urban Infrastructure Limited, along with individual landowners, challenged the denial of in...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Endorsement Denying Khata Transfer in Land Conversion Dispute — Municipal Authority Cannot Refuse Khata Transfer Based on Revenue Entries Alone Without Considering Conversion Order. The court held that once conversion under Section 95 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 is granted, the municipal authority must consider the application for khata transfer in accordance with the conversion, and cannot reject it solely on the ground that revenue records still show the land as agricultural.

6 Dec 2021

The petitioners, Smt. Prabhavathi M.S. and Dr. Subramanya P.S., are the wife and son of late P.S. Srinivasamurthy, residents of Periyapatna Town. They...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Appellants Failed to Prove Title and Possession. Land Acquisition Under KIAD Act Upheld as Appellants Were Not Owners and Compensation Was Already Paid to Recorded Owner.

17 Aug 2020

The appellants, Sri K. Srinivas Murthy and Smt S.V. Padma, filed a writ appeal against the order of a Single Judge dismissing their writ petition chal...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes KIADB Order Denying Lodging and Boarding in Industrial Area — Violation of Natural Justice. Allotment of industrial shed for fabrication unit does not preclude ancillary use like lodging and boarding for workers, and denial without hearing is arbitrary under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution.

9 Jul 2020

The petitioner, M/s Durga Fabrication Works, represented by its proprietor Sri Prakash Ramu Rathod, was allotted an industrial shed in Plot No.10D of ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Consent Award in Land Acquisition Case — Appellant Bound by Voluntary Agreement Under Section 29(2) of KIAD Act, 1966. The court held that a statutory agreement under Section 29(2) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966, once voluntarily entered into, bars the landowner from seeking enhancement of compensation through a reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

10 Jan 2020

The appellant, Rangaswamy B M, was the owner of land acquired under the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 (KIAD Act). A consent award w...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Stressed Assets Stabilization Fund Against Lease Forfeiture by West Bengal Small Industries Development Corporation. Mortgagee Cannot Claim Rights Superior to Lessee When Lease Has Been Validly Terminated.

21 Oct 2019

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Calcutta High Court which dismissed the appeal of the Stressed Assets Stabilization Fund (SASF) against an ord...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Industrial Development — Petitioners Failed to Show Violation of Statutory Provisions. The Court held that the acquisition under the KIAD Act, 1966 was valid and the petitioners were not entitled to higher compensation as they had already received enhanced compensation under a consent award.

3 Jun 2019

The petitioners, Smt. Kempamma and others, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the acquisition of...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)