Search Results for "Joint venture"

569 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 569 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Scope of Section 45 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act in International Commercial Disputes. Multiple Issues Framed on Reference to Arbitration in Multi-Party Joint Venture Agreements.

The dispute arose from a series of joint venture and ancillary agreements executed between Indian company Chloro Controls (I) P. Ltd. and foreign coll...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Interim Order Restraining Non-Compete Beyond Contract Term. Arbitrator erred in treating Joint Venture Company as partnership and enforcing non-compete clause beyond its stipulated duration under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Commercial Arbitration Petition No.25 of 2021 was filed by Elster Instromet B.V. (Instromet) challenging an order dated 09/10/2020 passed by the A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Division Bench Order in AIADMK Internal Dispute — Interim Injunction Denied for Party Meetings. Court holds that temporary injunction in political party affairs requires strict compliance with CPC principles and balance of convenience.

The Supreme Court disposed of a batch of appeals arising from interim orders in civil suits concerning the internal management of the All India Anna D...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Joint Venture Dispute — Arbitration Clause Survives Termination of Agreement. Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 invoked for disputes arising from Joint Venture Agreement dated 28th March, 2007.

The applicant, M/s. Atul & Arkade Realty, a partnership firm engaged in real estate development, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitrat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tender Award for Water Supply Scheme. Court sets aside award to Respondent No.5 and directs fresh evaluation of petitioner's bid as per tender conditions.

The petitioner, Jain Irrigation Systems Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act and engaged in manufacturing plastic pipes and executi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Joint Venture Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on breach of joint venture agreement and rejection of counter claims as not perverse.

The petitioner, Development Corporation of Konkan Limited, a government company, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Stay of Civil Suit Pending Arbitration in Joint Venture Dispute. Arbitration Clause in Joint Venture Agreement Mandates Reference to Arbitration Under Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, M/s Eagle AgroFarm Private Limited, owned certain properties and entered into a Joint Venture Agreement dated 9 May 2006 with Responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Tender Award in Municipal Contract Case for Violation of Tender Conditions and Lack of Transparency. The Court held that the Corporation's decision to award the contract to a technically disqualified bidder was arbitrary and unsustainable.

The case involves a writ petition filed by Kirloskar Brothers Limited (Maharashtra Electro-mech Joint Venture) challenging the tender process conducte...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Refer Dispute to Arbitration Under Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Joint Venture Agreements Not Signed by Appellant, No Arbitration Agreement Between Parties.

The appeal arose from an order dated 8 April 2004 passed by the learned trial Judge dismissing Notice of Motion No. 778 of 2004, which was an applicat...