Search Results for "Ineligibility"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "Ineligibility"

172 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 172 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Suspension of Hockey Players in Sports Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Jurisdiction. Suspension Order Issued by Hockey Karnataka Without Proper Inquiry and Without Authority Under National Sports Development Code, 2011 and Hockey India Bye-Laws.

8 Jul 2026

The petitioners, seven hockey players, were suspended by Hockey Karnataka (the first respondent) via a letter dated 18.06.2026. The petitioners challe...

High Court

High Court Quashes Arbitral Awards in Arbitration Petitions Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Due to Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrator. Unilateral Appointment Renders Arbitrator De Jure Ineligible Under Section 12(5), and Waiver Requires Express Written Agreement After Dispute Arises, Not Mere Participation in Proceedings.

5 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from multiple arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging arbitral awards pass...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Loan Recovery Case Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Upholds Award of Rs.1,26,46,303/- with Interest at 12% Per Annum. The court held that the arbitrator had applied his mind and there was no violation of natural justice or public policy.

23 Dec 2025

The case involves a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by Manmohan Bhimsen Goyal and Kavita Manmohan Goyal ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Government Contract Dispute Despite Non-Exhaustion of Pre-Arbitration Procedure. Party Autonomy and Minimal Judicial Intervention Upheld Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

28 Nov 2025

The appellant, Hindustan Construction Company Ltd., was awarded a contract by the respondent, Bihar Rajya Pul Nirman Nigam Ltd. (BRPNNL), on 04.03.201...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus to Follow Rule 13D(2-A) of Karnataka Co-operative Societies Rules, 1960 in Elections to Milk Union Board. Court Directs Inclusion of Petitioner Societies in Electoral Process for Mandya District Co-operative Milk Producers Societies Union Ltd.

2 May 2025

The petitioners, three milk producers' co-operative societies registered under the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959, filed a writ petition u...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrators Violates Equality Principle Under Section 18 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Party Autonomy Cannot Override Mandatory Requirement of Independence and Impartiality, and Unilateral Appointment Clauses in Public-Private Contracts Are Unconscionable and Void.

13 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court of India, in a Constitution Bench judgment, addressed the validity of unilateral appointment of arbitrators under the Arbitration an...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Remands Case to Regional Joint Director for Fresh Enquiry into Member Eligibility in Cooperative Society. The Court held that the enquiry violated principles of natural justice by not disclosing the Committee's Report and failing to conduct an individual assessment of members under bye-law 17-A of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

4 Jan 2023

The dispute arose from complaints filed under Section 11 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act 1960, alleging that approximately 2000 members o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Interprets Section 29A(h) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Regarding Guarantor Eligibility. The court held that a person who has executed an enforceable guarantee is not disqualified from submitting a resolution plan unless the guarantee has been invoked, as liability crystallizes upon invocation under the amended provisions.

18 Jan 2022

The Supreme Court was called upon to interpret Section 29A(h) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, as amended, concerning the eligibility of a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Sabka Vishwas Scheme Case — Directs Reconsideration of Application Under 'Litigation' Category. Petitioner's application under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 rejected due to misclassification; court holds that mere pendency of appeal qualifies as 'litigation' and directs respondents to process application accordingly.

8 Mar 2021

The petitioners, Morde Foods Pvt. Ltd. and its director, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the rejectio...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Appointment Dispute — CMD's Ineligibility to Act as Arbitrator Renders Appointment Void Ab Initio. Express Agreement in Writing Under Section 12(5) Proviso Must Be Post-Dispute and Cannot Be Inferred from Pre-Dispute Conduct.

10 Apr 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Bharat Broadband Network Limited (BBNL) against the judgment of the Delhi High Court, which had rejecte...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)