Search Results for "Hotel Pramod"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Hotel Pramod"

128 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 128 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Section 9 Petition for Liquor License Renewal in LLP Dispute. Court Assesses Whether Non-Renewal of Liquor License Violates Injunction and Whether Petitioners Acted Equitably Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

10 Jul 2025

The dispute arose from a Limited Liability Partnership Agreement dated March 24, 2023, executed to run a Resto-Bar business named Hotel Pramod at Tard...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Eviction Order Against Police Sub-Inspector in Accommodation Dispute — Controller of Accommodation Lacks Jurisdiction Over Premises Allotted by Police Commissioner Under Section 22 of Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947. Allotment by Police Authorities Not Under the Act, Hence Order Without Jurisdiction.

20 Dec 2005

The petitioner, Mr. Prakash Babu Harmalkar, a Police Sub-Inspector who joined the Maharashtra Police Force in 1979, was allotted Flat No.6 on the firs...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Quash Rape FIR in Promise-to-Marry Case — Relationship Based on False Promise of Marriage Constitutes Rape Under Section 376 IPC. The Court held that a false promise to marry made with no intention to marry vitiates consent and amounts to rape, and that the FIR prima facie discloses a cognizable offence.

2 Aug 2024

The petitioner filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 seeking quashing o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Reserves Judgment in PIL Challenging Redevelopment Permissions in Heritage Precinct. Residents Allege Violation of Development Control Regulations and Arbitrary Administrative Actions by Municipal Authorities and Developer.

19 Oct 2018

The matter before the Bombay High Court was a Public Interest Litigation filed by four residents of Carmichael Road, Mumbai, including Normandie Coope...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction Decree Against Tenant for Arrears of Rent — Notice Served at School Address Valid. Service of notice at tenant's school address held sufficient under Section 106 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 when tenant is known to be employed there and refuses to accept notice at suit premises.

15 Jul 2024

The dispute arises from a suit for eviction filed by the landlord (respondent) against the tenant (petitioner) in respect of three rooms and an enclos...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Challenge to Caste Validity Certificates — Employer Lacks Locus Standi Under Maharashtra Caste Certificate Act, 2000. Corporation Cannot Challenge Certificates Issued to Employees as Only Person Aggrieved or State Government Can Do So.

20 Aug 2024

The Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation (PCMC) filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the caste validity certificates issue...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines PIL for Heritage Conservation — Government's Omission of Buildings from Heritage List Without Consultation and Reasons Under Section 31 of MRTP Act Challenged. Petitioner Society Asserts That Statutory Procedure Was Not Followed and Heritage Conservation Committee's Recommendations Were Ignored.

5 May 2006

The Vidarbha Heritage Society, a registered society formed in 1997, filed a public interest litigation before the Bombay High Court at Nagpur seeking ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Order Under Section 13A(2) of Bombay Rent Act — Licence Not Tenancy. Occupant Failed to Prove Tenancy; Landlord's Licence Claim Accepted.

9 Aug 2005

The revision applicant, Vishnu Tayappa Kamble, challenged an order of the Competent Authority at Pune allowing Application No. 47 of 1996 under Sectio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Petition by Tenants in Eviction Suit — Landlord's Bonafide Need Not Proved. Requirement of Suit Premises for Business of Son-in-law Not Established as Bonafide Need Under Section 13(1)(g) of Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.

9 Aug 2011

This Civil Revision Application was filed by the original defendants/tenants, Smt. Gumfabai Dattalal Jaiswal and Pramod Dattalal Jaiswal, challenging ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application in Rent Control Case — Eviction Set Aside Due to Invalid Notice Under Section 12(3)(a) of the Bombay Rents Act. Notice demanding arrears of rent must give 15 clear days as per Section 106 of Transfer of Property Act, and service on 30th April demanding payment by 15th May does not comply.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the original defendant No.1, Anil Gangekar, against the judgment and decree of eviction passed...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)