Search Results for "Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act 2005"

210 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 210 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Examines Whether Amended Section 6 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Operates Retrospectively. The Correctness of the Division Bench Decision in Vaishali Satish Ganorkar Holding Prospective Operation is Challenged, with Parties Citing Supreme Court Precedents.

This matter comprises a batch of second appeals before the Bombay High Court, Civil Appellate Jurisdiction, presided over by Justice R.G. Ketkar. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Full Bench Interprets Prospective vs. Retrospective Operation of Amended Section 6 of Hindu Succession Act in Second Appeals. Court Examines Coparcenary Rights of Daughters Born Before and After 2005 Amendment and Whether Division Bench Decision Is Per Incuriam.

This matter came before a Full Bench of the Bombay High Court upon a reference by a learned Single Judge (R.G. Ketkar, J.) who doubted the correctness...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Daughter's Right to Coparcenary Share Under Amended Section 6 of Hindu Succession Act Despite Father's Death Before 1956 Act. Daughter Granted 1/4th Share in Suit Property as Amendment is Retrospective and Confers Coparcenary Rights from Birth.

The case involves a second appeal before the Bombay High Court challenging the judgments of the trial court and the first appellate court in a partiti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit, Upholds Retrospective Application of Amendment Deleting Section 23 of Hindu Succession Act. Female Heirs Entitled to Partition of Dwelling House as Amendment Removes Disability and Applies to Pending Appeals.

The case involves a partition suit filed by Respondent No.1 (original plaintiff) against her brothers, including the Appellant (original defendant No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition to Implead Daughter in Final Decree Proceedings Under Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC — Amendment to Section 6 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Confers Coparcenary Rights on Daughters Born Before 2005

The petitioner, Smt. Honamma, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 4.6.2014 passed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit — Daughters Cannot Claim Share in Coparcenary Property Allotted to Father Before 20th December 2004. The Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 is prospective and does not affect partitions effected prior to the amendment.

The case involves a Regular First Appeal (RFA) filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against the judgment and decree dated...