Search Results for "Gross Fixed Capital Investment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Gross Fixed Capital Investment"

73 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 73 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeals by Sahara Companies on SEBI's Regulatory Powers Over OFCDs. Case centers on Section 55A(b) Companies Act and compliance with DIP Guidelines for issuance of optionally fully convertible debentures.

1 Aug 2026

The case involved two Sahara Group companies, Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited (SIRECL) and Sahara Housing Investment Corporation Limited ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Appeal on Taxability of Capital Gains from Transfer of Shares of a Cayman Islands Company Holding Indian Telecom Assets. The core issue involves whether the offshore transaction is liable to capital gains tax in India under the Income Tax Act, 1961, given that the company's value is derived from Indian telecom assets.

1 Aug 2026

The matter concerned a tax dispute between Vodafone International Holdings BV (VIH), a Netherlands resident company, and the Indian Revenue authoritie...

High Court

Bombay High Court Admits MVAT Appeal on Questions of Law Regarding Package Scheme of Incentives and Retrospective Amendment. Appeal Challenges Pro-Rata Exemption Applied Under Amended Section 93 of Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002, Asserting Full Exemption After Exhaustion of Benefits Before Amendment.

29 Oct 2018

...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Examines Challenge to Assessment Order Restricting Sales Tax Incentives under Package Scheme of Incentives, 1993. Expansion Unit Seeks Quashing of Order Alleging It Is Without Jurisdiction and Contrary to Scheme Terms.

14 Aug 2018

The petitioner, Mahindra & Mahindra Limited, a company engaged in the manufacture and sale of automobiles and spare parts, filed a writ petition befor...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru considers batch of income tax appeals under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging ITAT orders for assessment years 2001-02 to 2004-05. Assessee and Revenue both seek to set aside the ITAT decisions and frame substantial questions of law.

25 Mar 2015

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru dealt with a batch of income tax appeals filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeals a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Income Tax Appeals Filed by Assessee and Revenue Under Section 260-A of Income Tax Act, 1961. Multiple Appeals Clubbed for Hearing Involving Assessment Years 2001-2002 to 2004-2005.

25 Mar 2015

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Adjudicates Tax Treatment of Compensation for Partial Termination of Selling Agency under Income Tax Act, 1922. The Court considered whether the sum received by the assessee for termination of agency rights outside Hyderabad State constituted a capital receipt or revenue receipt.

20 Mar 1959

Background: The case involved the income tax assessment of the respondent, a registered firm carrying on business as selling agents and distributors o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue’s Appeal, Holding Compensation for Partial Termination of Agency is Capital Receipt. Termination of Agency for Territory Outside Hyderabad State Results in Sterilisation of Capital Asset, Not Taxable as Business Income Under Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.

20 Mar 1959

The dispute arose from the income tax assessment of Messrs. Vazir Sultan & Sons, a registered firm, for the assessment year 1951-52. The firm was appo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Sales Tax Incentive Scheme Withdrawal — No Promissory Estoppel Against Policy Change in Public Interest. The court held that the withdrawal of a general sales tax incentive scheme by the State Government was valid and not violative of promissory estoppel or legitimate expectation.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by industrial units (M/s. Vidarbha Winding Wires Ltd., M/s. Chandrapur Vidyut Conductors Private Ltd....

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Disposes of Appeals by Authority for Advance Rulings Against High Court Judgment Quashing AAR's Rejection of Treaty Benefits. Questions Raised on Taxation of Capital Gains Under India-Mauritius DTAA and Scope of Section 245R(2) Proviso (iii) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

1 Jan 1970

The disputes arose from applications for advance ruling filed by three Mauritius-incorporated companies—Tiger Global International II Holdings, Tige...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)