Search Results for "GST Intelligence"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "GST Intelligence"

64 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 64 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging GST Summons Issued Without Jurisdiction — Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction Renders Proceedings Void Ab Initio. The court quashed summons under Section 70 of CGST Act, 2017 issued by an officer in Coimbatore to a Nagpur-based company, holding that the officer lacked territorial jurisdiction.

6 May 2026

The petitioner, M/s D P Jain & Co. Infrastructure Private Limited, a Nagpur-based company, challenged summons issued by the Senior Intelligence Office...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes GST Demand Against University for Violation of Natural Justice — Failure to Grant Personal Hearing Renders Order Illegal Under Section 74(1) of CGST Act, 2017. Circulars Mandating Personal Hearing Before Adverse Order Are Binding on Adjudicating Authority.

27 Apr 2026

The University of Mumbai, established under the Bombay University Act, 1953 and later governed by the Maharashtra Public Universities Act, 2016, filed...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Commercial Court Order and Restores Arbitral Award in Service Agreement Dispute Over Witness Competence Issue. Commercial Court Erred in Finding Patent Illegality Based on Inadmissibility of Authorized Representative's Evidence Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as Witness Competence Relates to Evidence Appreciation, Not Fundamental Legal Error.

10 Feb 2026

The dispute originated from a Master Service Agreement dated 11.04.2019  where Appellant agreed to provide temporary delivery executives to Swigg...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955 in Assam Accord Challenge — Majority Holds Cut-off Date of 25.03.1971 for Regularisation of Immigrants Valid. The court held that the provision is a reasonable classification under Article 14 and does not violate Articles 6, 7, 29, 325, 326, 355, 356, or 368 of the Constitution.

17 Mar 2025

The Supreme Court, in a batch of petitions and appeals, considered the constitutional validity of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955, which was i...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Section 498A IPC as Constitutionally Valid but Issues Guidelines to Prevent Misuse. The court held that the provision is not unconstitutional but requires safeguards against misuse through directions on arrest, investigation, and compounding of offences.

10 Mar 2025

The Supreme Court in this batch of writ petitions and appeals considered the constitutional validity of Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, w...

High Court

Supreme Court Allows Union's Appeals in Advance Authorization IGST Exemption Case. The Court upholds the pre-import condition as a valid policy measure to prevent double benefit and cash blockage, reversing the Gujarat High Court's decision.

10 Oct 2024

The case involves appeals by the Union of India against a Gujarat High Court judgment that set aside the mandatory 'pre-import condition' for claiming...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeals and Dismisses Assessees' Writ Petitions in GST Input Tax Credit Case — Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 17(5)(c) and (d) of CGST Act. Court holds that denial of ITC on construction of immovable property used for renting is valid and does not violate Articles 14, 19(1)(g), or 300A.

3 Oct 2024

The case involves a challenge to the constitutional validity of clauses (c) and (d) of sub-section (5) of Section 17 of the Central Goods and Services...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes GST Summons Issued by DGGI Ahmedabad to Petitioners in Maharashtra for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Summons under Section 70 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 must be issued by an officer having jurisdiction over the place of business of the person summoned.

28 Mar 2024

The petitioners, Shantanu Sanjay Hundekari, Vikas Agarwal, Yogesh Agarwal, and Mamta Gupta, are residents of Maharashtra and their place of business i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of GST Circulars on Input Tax Credit Reversal for Exempted Supplies. Circulars Clarifying Section 17(2) of CGST Act, 2017 Held Not Ultra Vires as They Merely Interpret Existing Provisions.

13 Feb 2024

The petitioner, Fomento Resorts and Hotels Ltd., a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, challenged the validity of Circular No.3...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.

30 Nov -0001

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)