Somanahalli Toll Plaza Case: Karnataka High Court Protects Local Residents from Daily Toll Charges.
28 Jan 2026The Karnataka High Court partly allowed a writ petition filed by residents of Somanahalli, Nelaguli and Kaggalipura villages challen...
Search Results for "Fee Determination"
560 result(s) found
Found 560 result(s)
Supreme Court
Court Rules on Bar Council Enrolment Fees: Balancing Statutory Limits and Practical Necessities. Ensuring Accessibility and Fairness in Legal Profession Entry While Addressing Operational Costs
30 Jul 2024The judgment addresses the issue of whether the enrolment fees charged by State Bar Councils (SBCs) exceed the statutory limits set by Section 24(1)(f...
- 380
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Telecom Company's Claim for Refund of Entry Fee After 2G Licences Quashed Due to Illegal Government Policy. Restitution Under Section 65 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 Denied as Quashing Did Not Render Contracts Void, and Set-Off Policy Upheld Under Article 14 of Constitution.
3 Mar 2022The dispute involved a telecom company seeking a refund of an Entry Fee of Rs 1454.94 crores paid for 2G licences across twenty-one service areas, aft...
- 277
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Corporation in Water Tax Levy Under UP Water Supply and Sewerage Act, 1975 - Reverses Refund Order. Water and Sewerage Tax Imposed on Premises is Valid as Tax on Lands and Buildings Under Entry 49 of List II, Not a Fee, Under Section 52(1)(a) of the Act.
22 Oct 2021The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by the first respondent, Pradeshiya Industrial and Investment Corporation, challenging the levy of water ...
- 197
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition Against Trial Court's Order on Court Fee in Partition Suit — Section 35(1) of Karnataka Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958. The court held that the trial court must first determine the market value of the suit properties before directing the plaintiff to pay proper court fee.
24 Aug 2021The petitioner, Anjanappa, filed a suit for partition (O.S.No.808/2008) before the Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Devanahalli, seeking 1/3rd share i...
- 98
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Court Fee Valuation Dispute: Circle Rate Not Conclusive for Market Value Under Section 7(iv-A) of Court Fees Act. The Court held that the market value for court fee purposes must be determined based on pleadings and evidence, not merely the circle rate fixed by the Collector.
19 Feb 2020The appellant, Agra Diocesan Trust Association, filed two suits (O.S. 24/2013 and O.S. 25/2013) in the court of Civil Judge (Senior Division), Dehradu...
- 521
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Restores Fee Regulatory Committee's Determination in Telangana Professional College Fee Dispute. Court Sets Aside High Court's Re-determination of Fees for B.E./B.Tech Courses for Block Period 2016-2019, Upholding Expert Committee's Uniform Fee of Rs.97,000 per Student.
1 Jul 2019The Supreme Court considered appeals arising from a dispute over the fixation of fee structure for B.E. and B.Tech courses in private unaided professi...
- 291
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Fee Regulation Act in Challenge by Parents' Association — School Fee Fixation Must Comply with Statutory Framework Under Maharashtra Educational Institutions (Regulation of Fees) Act, 2013. The court held that the Act and Rules are constitutionally valid and directed the Fee Regulatory Committee to reconsider the fee structure.
7 Aug 2018The petitioners, Khed Taluka Vidyarthi Palak Sangh (a society registered under the Maharashtra Societies Registration Act, 1860) and Kiran Kamlakar Kh...
- 26
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Deficit Court Fee Demand in Railway Claims Tribunal Appeal. Fixed Court Fee of Rs.25 Held Applicable Under Article 3 of Schedule II of Maharashtra Court Fees Act, 1959 for Appeals Under Section 23 of Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987.
2 Aug 2017The applicants, dependants of deceased Rajanna Linganna Akitwar who died in an untoward incident of falling from a train on 23.04.2012, filed a claim ...
- 11
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Locus of Parents in Fee Regulation. Individual parents held to have standing under Maharashtra Educational Institutes (Regulation of Fees) Act to approach Divisional Fee Regulatory Committee.
18 Jul 2017The Bombay High Court heard two writ petitions challenging the locus of individual parents to approach the Divisional Fee Regulatory Committee (DFRC) ...
- 49
