Search Results for "Excavation Costs"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Excavation Costs"

204 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 204 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Division Bench Reviews Section 34 Order Setting Aside Arbitral Award on Electricity, Price Variation, and Excavation Claims. The Single Judge found the Arbitral Tribunal excluded vital letters and contract clauses under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 34, warranting the Section 37 appeal.

22 Jul 2025

The appeal arose from an arbitral award concerning a construction contract for a railway tunnel. Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd, a Government of India...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty for Excavation of Earth Without Permission in Construction Project. Excavation for Foundation Laying and Backfilling Does Not Amount to 'Illegal Excavation' Under Section 48(7) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

5 Jul 2017

The petitioner, M/s BGR Energy Systems Limited, was awarded a contract by Maharashtra State Power Generation Company Limited (MAHAGENCO) for construct...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty for Excavation of Ordinary Earth Without Authorization Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code — Petitioner Had Valid Development Permission and No Mining Intent. Excavation of ordinary earth as part of construction project does not attract royalty or penalty under Section 48(7) of MLRC if done under valid development permission.

8 Mar 2024

The petitioner, AIGP Developers (Pune) Private Limited, challenged an order dated 29 June 2023 passed by the Tehsildar, Haveli (Pune), under Section 4...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Petitions Against Royalty Demands for Excavation During Building Construction Under Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. Petitioners Argue Excavation Incidental to Permitted Construction Does Not Constitute Mining.

8 Oct 2010

The Bombay High Court heard four writ petitions challenging the demand of royalty and penalty by revenue authorities for excavation carried out during...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tahsildar's Demand for Royalty on Excavated Material During Construction. Held that Tahsildar lacks jurisdiction to levy royalty on material excavated pursuant to valid development permission under MRTP Act and NA permission under MLR Code.

9 Dec 2021

The petitioner, originally Flagship Infrastructure Pvt Ltd and now Paranjape Schemes (Construction) Limited, filed a writ petition challenging a show ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Royalty Demand on Excavated Material from Development Site. Tahsildar lacks jurisdiction to levy royalty under Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 for excavation during construction pursuant to valid development permission.

9 Dec 2021

The petitioner, Paranjape Schemes (Construction) Ltd., a company engaged in real estate development, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Cour...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Penalty and Royalty for Unauthorized Excavation of Earth During Sewerage Pipeline Project. Revenue Officials' Demand Under Section 48(7) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Quashed as Excavation Was Incidental to Public Works Contract and Not for Commercial Use.

28 Mar 2024

The petitioners, M/s. Ramky Infrastructure Ltd. and its shareholder, challenged the imposition of penalty and royalty by revenue officials under Secti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty Notice for Excavation of Ordinary Earth Without Permit — Holds That Prior Approval Under Section 21(6) of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 Is Not Required for Government Companies Executing Railway Projects. The court found that the notice proposing penalty for excavation of minor mineral without permission was invalid as the petitioners were a Public Sector Undertaking of the Ministry of Railways and the excavation was for a public purpose.

29 Mar 2019

The petitioners, Ircon International Limited (a Public Sector Undertaking of the Ministry of Railways) and others, challenged a notice dated 4th Decem...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Contractor's Petition, Quashes Royalty and Penalty Demand for Excavation of Minor Mineral at Railway's Instance. Contractor Not Liable Under Section 48(7) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 as Excavation Was Done Under Instructions of Landowner Railways.

7 Jul 2017

The petitioner, Rakesh P. Verma, a government civil contractor, was engaged by Respondent No. 3, South East Central Railway, Nagpur, under an agreemen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Against State's Rejection of Refund for Unexcavated Sand in Excavation Contract. Petitioner, as successful bidder, sought quashing of state's order denying refund on grounds of inability to excavate due to local opposition and site conditions.

30 Apr 2025

The petitioner, Ankush Kashinath Mhaske, was declared the successful bidder for sand excavation in five villages on the banks of river Kukadi in Novem...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)