Search Results for "Electric Towers"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Electric Towers"

38 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 38 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition Challenging Notification and Order for Removal of Obstructions — Violation of Natural Justice. Order Under Section 16(1) of Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 Quashed as Petitioners Were Not Heard.

19 Feb 2026

The petitioners, Dalwadi Pramodkumar Dayarambhai and others, filed a writ petition before the Gujarat High Court challenging a notification published ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Takes Suo Motu Cognizance of Elephant Electrocution, Directs Comprehensive Measures for Wildlife Protection. The Court issued directions to prevent unnatural deaths of wild animals, emphasizing the State's duty to protect wildlife under Article 51A(g) of the Constitution and the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972.

26 Apr 2025

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, presided by Chief Justice N.V. Anjaria and Justice M.I. Arun, delivered a judgment in a suo motu public inte...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows CENVAT Credit on Mobile Towers and Prefabricated Buildings for Mobile Service Providers — Interprets 'Capital Goods' and 'Inputs' Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Mobile towers and PFBs are essential for providing telecom services and qualify as capital goods or inputs under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

22 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court of India adjudicated a batch of appeals concerning the eligibility of mobile service providers (MSPs) to claim CENVAT credit on exci...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Transmission Tower Construction Under Subsequently Revoked Restraint Order. Work done under Section 16(2) Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 order held valid despite later revocation for lack of jurisdiction, as order was in force at time of execution.

17 Apr 2024

The petitioner, Maheshkumar G. Garodia, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Rental Compensation for Transmission Towers Erected in 1981 Without Consent or Compensation. Landowners entitled to compensation under Section 10(d) of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 read with Section 164 of the Electricity Act, 2003 for continued use of land.

7 Dec 2022

The petitioners, eight landowners from Ashiv and Wangi villages in Latur district, filed a writ petition seeking quashing of an order dated 04.07.2018...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Flat Buyers Against Developer for Delayed Possession, Holds Unilateral Compensation Clause Unfair. Developer's stipulation of Rs 5 per sq ft per month as liquidated damages for delay held inadequate and unconscionable; flat buyers entitled to compensation at 6% per annum on amounts paid.

24 Aug 2020

The case involves appeals by 171 flat buyers against the dismissal of their consumer complaint by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Injunction in Electricity Transmission Line Dispute — Balance of Convenience Favours Completion of Line Subject to Compensation. The Court held that where the District Magistrate has granted permission under Section 16(1) of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 and 80% of the work is complete, the balance of convenience does not justify an interim injunction.

9 Jan 2019

The first respondent, IVP Limited, owned non-agricultural land in villages Vadavali and Mohane. It filed a suit for permanent injunction alleging that...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Injunction in Electricity Act Dispute — LILO Scheme Not a 'Works' Under Section 164. Court holds that LILO scheme does not constitute 'laying of electric lines' under Section 164 of the Electricity Act, 2003, and that the District Judge correctly upheld the injunction against the petitioner.

9 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Century Rayon Limited, challenged an order dated 28 June 2018 passed by the learned District Judge-4, Kalyan, dismissing its Miscellan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Transmission Line Over Private Land, Upholds Validity of Section 164 of Electricity Act, 2003. The Court Held That the Provisions for Laying Electricity Lines Without Prior Consent Are Constitutional as They Provide for Hearing and Compensation.

3 Aug 2015

The petitioners, Jarnail Singh and Surinder Singh, are owners of land in Nagpur over which respondent No.1, Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Appeal for Damages for Encroachment by Electricity Department — Power to Lay Lines Without Acquisition Upheld Under Indian Electricity Act, 1910 and Indian Telegraph Act, 1885. The court held that the respondents had statutory authority to lay electric lines on private property without acquiring it, and the suit was barred by limitation.

3 Sep 2010

The appellants, owners of a property named 'BONOBO' in Goa, filed a suit for damages against the Government of Goa and the Superintending Engineer, El...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)