Search Results for "Dissolution of marriage"

33 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 33 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dissolves Marriage Under Article 142 in Transfer Petition Due to Irretrievable Breakdown and Allows Transfer of Proceedings

The marriage between the parties, solemnised in 2012, survived only for a brief period, after which they began living separately. For more than thirte...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Husband Under Section 498A IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act -- Allegations Found General and Unsubstantiated in Matrimonial Discord Case -- Proceedings Set Aside as Counterblast to Legal Notice

The Supreme Court allowed the criminal appeal filed by the husband against the Telangana High Court order refusing to quash criminal proceedings under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dissolves Marriage Under Article 142 Due to Irretrievable Breakdown -- Husband Directed to Pay Permanent Alimony in Hindu Marriage Act Case

The Supreme Court allowed the husband's appeal seeking divorce from his wife. The parties were married in 2003 and had been living separately since 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Desertion-Based Divorce Decree, Grants Divorce by Mutual Consent Under Article 142 of Constitution of India, Awards Permanent Alimony in Hindu Marriage Act Case

The Supreme Court heard an appeal against the High Court order affirming divorce decree granted on ground of desertion under Hindu Marriage Act 1955 -...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal and Dissolves Marriage on Ground of Irretrievable Breakdown Using Article 142 Powers. Marriage Found Completely Broken Down with No Emotional Connection Between Parties, Warranting Dissolution Despite Earlier Withdrawn Petitions Under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

The Supreme Court considered an appeal concerning the dissolution of marriage between parties who had married on February 14, 2000. The appellant had ...