Search Results for "Demand draft"

1198 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1198 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Tender Dispute Over EMD Mode — Fixed Deposit Held Valid for Out-of-State Bidder. Tender Condition Requiring Demand Draft for Out-of-State Bidders Interpreted as Directory, Not Mandatory, Based on Consistent State Practice.

The appellant, RR Constructions and Infrastructure India Pvt. Ltd., an out-of-State bidder, was disqualified by the High Court for submitting a Fixed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Criminal Writ Petition as Infructuous After Petitioner's Release and Resolution of Demand Draft Issue. Petition filed under misconception that demand drafts were not sent as directed, but drafts were cancelled and amount credited to petitioner's account.

The petitioner, Mahesh Sharma, was a convicted prisoner who filed a Criminal Writ Petition under a misconception that two Demand Drafts of Rs.10,000 a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Writ Petition Against Interest on Retrenchment Compensation. Industrial Tribunal's Direction to Pay 12% Interest Set Aside as Employer Had Bona Fide Offered Payment and Amount Was Not Retained, Compliant with Sections 25-F, 25-G, 25-H of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

This writ petition arose from an industrial dispute concerning the retrenchment of 43 workmen by M/s. Bombay Film Enterprises Private Limited, a film ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Electricity Demand Notice for Violation of Natural Justice. Demand of Rs. 56,03,815.50 set aside as no opportunity of hearing was given before raising the demand under the Electricity Act, 2003.

The petitioner, Twenty First Century Wire Rods Limited, challenged a demand notice dated 22.09.2003 issued by respondent no.3 and the appellate order ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Quashing Banking Ombudsman Order in Demand Draft Cancellation Dispute. Petitioner Entitled to Cancellation of DD and Credit of Amount with Interest as RBI Circulars Permit Cancellation After Three Months and Complaint Was Within Limitation.

The petitioner, Doddaballapur Spinning Mills, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, held a current account with ICICI Bank Ltd. (respond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Legality of Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission’s Distribution Open Access Regulations. Challenge Concerns Alleged Jurisdictional Overreach Curtailing Consumers’ Right to Access Power Exchange Under the Electricity Act, 2003.

The provided text is an incomplete extract of a judgment from the Bombay High Court in a set of writ petitions (WP Nos. 2694/2014, 2318/2014, 2294/201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows SBI Appeal in Demand Draft Fraud Case — Bank Held Negligent for Confirming Non-Encashment Despite Prior Payment. SBI Bangalore's Own Negligence in Issuing Incorrect Confirmation Precludes Recovery from Collecting Bank Under Section 131 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant, State Bank of India (SBI), Bangalore branch, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, agains...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Quashing Banking Ombudsman Order in Demand Draft Cancellation Dispute. Petitioner Entitled to Cancellation of DD and Credit of Amount with Interest as Per RBI Circulars.

The petitioner, Doddaballapur Spinning Mills, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, held a current account with ICICI Bank Ltd. (respond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Rejection of Gratuity Deposit Application Under Section 7(7) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Appellate Authority's Order Upheld as No Provision Exists for Accepting Gratuity Amount During Pendency of Appeal.

The petitioner, The Maharashtra State Co-operative Marketing Federation Ltd., challenged an order dated 19th October 2018 passed by the Appellate Auth...