Search Results for "Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod"

23 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 23 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Transfer Petition in Cheque Dishonour Case, Upholds Jurisdiction Under Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

Bank’s Right to Choose Jurisdiction for Cheque Dishonour Cases Upheld – Transfer Denied Under Section 406 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Dishonour of Cheque Due to Insufficient Funds. Conviction Set Aside as Complainant Failed to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt or Liability Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The revision petition was filed by Smt. Gouri, the accused, challenging her conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Complainant in Dishonour of Cheque Cases, Holding That Territorial Jurisdiction Lies Where the Cheque Is Presented for Encashment Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Cheques Payable at Par Confer Jurisdiction at the Drawee Bank Branch Where Presented.

The petitioner, Helcino Aleixo Fernandes, a businessman residing in Majorda, Goa, filed nine complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Jurisdiction in NI Act Case — Place of Dishonour Determines Jurisdiction Under Section 138. Exception for Cases at Section 145(2) Stage Not Applicable as Case Was at Initial Stage.

The petitioner, Sushil Kumar Saxena, was the accused in Criminal Case No. 2361/SS/2011 pending before the Metropolitan Magistrate, 48th Court, Andheri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Conviction in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Dishonour of Cheque Due to Account Closed. Cheque issued for time-barred debt not legally enforceable debt under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The petitioners, Sidharth Narayan Siddhapur and M/s Taurus Earthmovers Limited, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the High Court of Bombay at Goa ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Conviction in Dishonour of Cheque Case Due to Non-Examination of Complainant's Partner. Failure to Prove Debt or Liability Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 as Complainant Firm Not Properly Represented.

The petitioners, Sidharth Narayan Siddhapur and M/s Taurus Earthmovers Limited, were the accused in a complaint filed by M/s Fluidmac, a partnership f...