Search Results for "DNA Profiling Test"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "DNA Profiling Test"

97 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 97 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes DNA Profiling Order in POCSO Case Due to Lack of Consent and Non-Compliance with Statutory Procedure. Court holds that DNA profiling of an accused without his consent and without following the procedure under Section 53A Cr.P.C. and the DNA Profiling Act, 2019 is illegal and violative of Article 20(3) of the Constitution.

10 Dec 2021

The petitioner, Malappa @ Malingaraya, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. see...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petitions in Succession Dispute Over Will Execution — Court Sets Aside Trial Court Order Dismissing Application for DNA Test of Will Executant. The Court Held That When Execution of a Will is Disputed on Grounds of Forgery or Fraud, DNA Profiling of the Testator May Be Ordered to Ascertain Genuineness Under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

24 Apr 2026

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Mrs. Shruti Sood alias Shruti Banerji, the widow of Late Amit Banerji, against her mother-in-law Mrs. Sa...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Plaintiff's Petition for DNA Test in Partition Suit — Order 26 Rule 10A CPC. The court held that a DNA test is permissible under Order 26 Rule 10A CPC to establish relationship when disputed in a partition suit.

8 Jan 2018

The petitioner, Smt. D.N. Mangala, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 11.04.2017 passed ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows DNA Test to Determine Paternity in Civil Suit for Declaration of Status. Court holds that DNA test is necessary to ascertain truth and does not violate right to privacy when ordered in a civil proceeding for declaration of paternity.

1 Jan 2026

The appellant, Chaturbhuj Pradhan (CP), was aggrieved by concurrent orders of the First Additional Civil Judge, Class-II, Basna and the High Court of ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Wife's Appeal Against DNA Test Order in Divorce Case, Upholding Marital Presumption of Paternity. The Court Held That the Presumption Under Section 112 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Cannot Be Rebutted by DNA Evidence Alone Without Proof of Non-Access, Protecting the Child's Legitimacy and Privacy Rights.

20 Feb 2023

The dispute arose from a divorce petition filed by the husband under Sections 13(1)(i) and (ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, alleging adultery by ...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Appeals Against Conviction Under Sections 302 and 201 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code in Newborn Murder Case. DNA Evidence Conclusively Proves that Both Accused Were Biological Parents of Deceased Child, Justifying Inference of Common Intention to Strangulate and Bury the Body.

29 Aug 2018

(1) The appeals arose from the conviction of two accused for murdering a newborn female child and causing disappearance of its body. The prosecution a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Order Allowing DNA Test Under Order XXVI Rule 10A CPC in Partition Suit. Petition Raises Questions of Right to Privacy Under Article 21 and Applicability of Section 112 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

1 Sep 2025

The writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India was filed by the third defendant in a partition suit, O.S. No. 89 of 2016, challengin...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows DNA Test in Partition Suit to Determine Paternity Under Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC. The court upheld the appellate court's order for DNA testing to establish the relationship between the parties in a partition suit.

3 Sep 2014

The petitioner, Sri Hanumappa, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 13.1.2014 passed by the Senior Civil Judge at Hiriyur in R.A.No.11/201...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for DNA Test in Paternity Dispute Under Order 26 Rule 10(a) CPC and Section 112 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872. The court set aside the Trial Court's rejection of the application for DNA test, holding that scientific evidence is necessary to determine paternity when disputed.

27 Sep 2024

The petitioner, Chandru, filed a suit (O.S.No.5/2017) before the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Hirekerur, claiming that defendant No.1, Huchcharayappa ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals and Upholds Conviction in Gang Rape Case Under Sections 363 and 376(D) IPC. DNA Analysis of Undergarment Stains Proved Guilt of All Four Accused, Trivializing Contradictions in Victim’s Narration and Test Identification Failures.

4 Oct 2017

Background: The appeals arose from the conviction of four men by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhandara, in Special Criminal (Child) Case No. 14 of 2...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)