Search Results for "DGGI"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "DGGI"

26 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 26 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Show-Cause Notice Under Section 74 of CGST Act for Lack of Jurisdiction — DGGI Officer Not Authorized as Proper Officer. The court held that only officers specifically authorized by the Commissioner can issue notices under Section 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and the DGGI officer lacked such authorization.

16 Jul 2025

The petitioner, M/s NCS Pearson Inc., a Minnesota-based corporation, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India bef...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955 in Assam Accord Challenge — Majority Holds Cut-off Date of 25.03.1971 for Regularisation of Immigrants Valid. The court held that the provision is a reasonable classification under Article 14 and does not violate Articles 6, 7, 29, 325, 326, 355, 356, or 368 of the Constitution.

17 Mar 2025

The Supreme Court, in a batch of petitions and appeals, considered the constitutional validity of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955, which was i...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Section 498A IPC as Constitutionally Valid but Issues Guidelines to Prevent Misuse. The court held that the provision is not unconstitutional but requires safeguards against misuse through directions on arrest, investigation, and compounding of offences.

10 Mar 2025

The Supreme Court in this batch of writ petitions and appeals considered the constitutional validity of Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, w...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes GST Summons Issued by DGGI Ahmedabad to Petitioners in Maharashtra for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Summons under Section 70 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 must be issued by an officer having jurisdiction over the place of business of the person summoned.

28 Mar 2024

The petitioners, Shantanu Sanjay Hundekari, Vikas Agarwal, Yogesh Agarwal, and Mamta Gupta, are residents of Maharashtra and their place of business i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of SVLDR Scheme Declaration — Petitioner Held Eligible Despite Summons Under CGST Act. Communication dated 2nd February 2020 rejecting declaration under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 quashed as summons under Section 174 of CGST Act does not constitute 'investigation' under Section 121(e) of Finance (No.2) Act, 2019.

13 Jun 2022

The petitioner, M/s. Anjali Services Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, was engaged in providing outdoor catering ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Restoration of SVLDRS Declaration Due to Non-Communication of Deficiency Memo. Petitioner's declaration under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 cannot be rejected without providing an opportunity to rectify defects as per Section 127 of Finance (No.2) Act, 2019.

31 Jan 2022

The petitioner, Mpower Facility Services Pvt. Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of t...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for Refund of Rs.27.51 Crore Collected Under Coercion in GST Investigation — Mandamus Issued for Unlawful Recovery Without Adjudication. Court Holds That Recovery Without Adjudication Is Illegal and Violative of Article 265, and Directs Refund With Interest.

14 Sep 2021

The petitioner, M/s. Bundl Technologies Private Limited, a company engaged in e-commerce, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Sabka Vishwas Scheme Case — CENVAT Credit Must Be Treated as Pre-deposit. Designated Committee directed to reconsider petitioner's declaration under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 by treating CENVAT credit of Rs.3,28,49,069.00 as pre-deposit.

28 Jan 2021

The petitioner, Fork Media Private Limited, a company engaged in digital advertising solutions and registered under the Finance Act, 1994, faced an en...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Declaration Under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 — Petitioner's Voluntary Disclosure of Service Tax Liability Prior to Summons Entitles It to Scheme Benefits. The court held that issuance of summons after voluntary disclosure does not disqualify the declarant under Section 125(1)(e) of Finance (No.2) Act, 2019.

8 Dec 2020

The petitioner, Saksham Facility Services Private Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, had service tax registration for provid...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.

30 Nov -0001

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)