Search Results for "Corruption allegations"

1034 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1034 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Considers Maintainability of Quo Warranto Petition Challenging Appointment of CMD of MOIL Limited. Preliminary Objection Raised that Post is Not a 'Public Office' Requiring Exercise of Sovereign Functions.

The case arose from a writ petition filed by a trade union, MOIL Janshakti Mazdoor Sangh, challenging the appointment of respondent No.6 as Chairman-c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Criminal Appeal Against Conviction in Bribery Case. Appeal Challenges Conviction Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act for Accepting ₹1,000 Bribe for Caste Verification Certificate.

The case arose from a complaint filed by Kiran Kumar, a temporary driver with BMTC, who alleged that T. Siddaiah, a First Division Assistant in the Ta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Talathi in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Shankar Pandurang Waghere, was a Talathi working in the revenue department. The complainant, Suhas Jagtap, held a Power of Attorney for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Rajendra Suryakant Kapile, was a Senior Clerk in the Sub-Regional Provident Fund Office, CIDCO, Aurangabad. The complainant, Dharamchan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Corroboration and Unreliable Trap Witnesses. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Rajesh s/o Roopchand Motghare, was a peon with Nagpur Municipal Corporation posted at octroi check post No.10, Wadi. On 20/8/2002, Dili...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Tax Superintendent in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Vijaykumar Marotrao Daiwalkar, was a Tax Superintendent in the Municipal Council, Chandrapur. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Police Inspector in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sopan s/o Kadu Choudhari, a Police Inspector, was convicted by the Special Judge, Gadchiroli for offences under Sections 7 and 13(2) of...