Search Results for "Clerical Error"

234 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 234 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Review Award in Land Acquisition Case — Review of Award Not Permitted Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Section 13A Only Allows Correction of Clerical or Arithmetical Mistakes Within Six Months, Not Substantive Review.

The case pertains to land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The appellants' land was acquired by a notification dated 23.0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Back Wages. Termination of workman without compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 held illegal, and reinstatement with full back wages upheld.

The petitioner, M/s. Carona Ltd., challenged the judgment and order of the Labour Court, Mumbai, dated 30th September 2016, in Reference (IDA) No. 156...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging CAT Order Allowing Change of Date of Birth of IAS Officer. Authorities' Delay in Deciding Application for Correction of Date of Birth Cannot Be Used to Defeat Claim Under Rule 38 of Maharashtra Civil Services (General Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981.

The Union of India and the State of Maharashtra filed two writ petitions challenging the judgment and order dated 8 March 2016 passed by the Central A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Recalls Order Dismissing Revision in Maintenance Case Due to Mistake of Fact Regarding Claim Amount. Family Court Erred in Treating Maintenance Claim as Rs.10,000 Instead of Rs.1,00,000 per Month Under Section 125 Cr.P.C.

The applicant, Jagruti Bhatia, filed Criminal Application No.35 of 2015 seeking recall of an order dated 20.1.2015 passed by the Bombay High Court in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Amendment of Probate Schedule by Prothonotary. Prothonotary has power to allow amendment of schedule of assets in probate proceedings under Section 317 of Indian Succession Act, 1925.

The petitioners, Mukesh Ramanlal Gokal and Bharat Ramanlal Gokal, filed a petition under the Testamentary and Intestate Jurisdiction of the Bombay Hig...