Search Results for "CESTAT appeal"

330 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 330 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against CESTAT Order in Service Tax Case — Limitation Bar Not Applicable. The court held that the Tribunal erred in dismissing the appeal on limitation grounds when the appeal was filed within the prescribed period under Section 85 of the Finance Act, 1994.

The petitioner, M/s. Practice Strategic Communications India Private Limited, a company providing management services, was issued a show cause notice ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging CESTAT Order Rejecting Recall of Fraud Finding in CENVAT Credit Case. Court holds that CESTAT's finding of mis-statement and fraud was not a reviewable error and that the Tribunal had inherent power to impose costs for abuse of process.

The petitioner, Essel Propack Limited, a company engaged in manufacturing plastic tubes, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Tribunal's Stay Order in Cenvat Credit Dispute. Tribunal's Detailed Findings at Stay Stage Prejudge the Appeal and Are Impermissible.

The appellant, CEAT Limited, filed an appeal before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 12th June 2014 passed by the Customs, Excise and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeals for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 35-G of Central Excise Act, 1944. CESTAT Orders Not Appealable to High Court as They Do Not Involve Questions of Law.

The Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs filed two appeals under Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against orders of the Customs, Excis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against CESTAT Predeposit Order in Central Excise Valuation Dispute. The Court held that the Tribunal must consider prima facie case, balance of convenience, and financial hardship while deciding waiver of predeposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

The appellant, Hyva (India) Private Limited, is engaged in body building on motor vehicle chassis supplied by Tata Motors Limited. Tata Motors clears ...