Search Results for "CBEC instructions"

25 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 25 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Withdrawal of Inter-Commissionerate Transfers for Inspectors Under Recruitment Rules 2016. Recruitment Rules Made Under Article 309 of the Constitution Prevail Over Executive Instructions, and ICTs Are Not Permissible as They Violate Separate Cadre Identity Under Rule 5.

The dispute arose from a batch of civil appeals filed by Inspectors of the Central Excise and Land Customs or Goods and Services Tax Administration, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Union of India Against Quashing of Show Cause Notices in Service Tax Classification Dispute. Transport Operators' Services Classified as 'Goods Transport Agency' Not 'Cargo Handling Service' Based on Binding CBEC Circulars.

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India against a Gujarat High Court judgment quashing show cause notices issued to transport operators unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Rebate Claims for Exported Cables in Central Excise Case — Emphasizes Substantive Compliance Over Procedural Technicalities. Revisional Authority Must Consider Merits, Not Merely Endorse Lower Authorities' Findings Under Rule 18 of Central Excise Rules, 2002.

The petitioner, UM Cables Limited, is a manufacturer of Polyethylene Insulated Jelly filled Copper Cables and Optical Fiber Cables, falling under tari...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue to Withdraw Customs Appeals Based on CBEC Monetary Threshold Instructions. Court permits withdrawal of appeals and review of Tribunal orders under Section 35R of Central Excise Act, 1944 and Section 131BA of Customs Act, 1962.

The Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, Goa, filed nine Customs Appeals under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, against orders of the Cust...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Classification of Plant Growth Promoters as Excisable Goods Under Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Products Containing NPK as Essential Constituent Classified as 'Other Fertilizers' Under Note 6 Chapter 3105, Attracting 1% Duty.

The petitioners, Dharti Agro Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. and its director, challenged an order dated 8 March 2017 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Sabka Vishwas Scheme Case Due to Moratorium Under IBC. Payment Delay Caused by Legal Disability Under Section 14 IBC, Designated Committee Directed to Accept Payment and Issue Discharge Certificate Under Finance Act, 2019 Scheme.

The dispute arose from the appellant company's inability to pay a settlement amount of Rs.1,24,28,500/- under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolu...