Search Results for "Bonafide purchaser"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Bonafide purchaser"

437 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 437 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Deputy Commissioner's Order Resuming Land to Government — Ground of Violation of Non-Alienation Condition Raised After 55 Years. Court Holds That Power Under Section 136(3) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 Cannot Be Exercised After Inordinate and Unexplained Delay, Citing Joint Collector Ranga Reddy District v. D. Narsing Rao (2015) 3 SCC 695.

1 Jul 2017

The writ petition was filed by Basavaradhya challenging the order of the Deputy Commissioner, Kolar District, dated 21.10.2015, which directed the res...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad Considers Civil Application Seeking Recall of Compromise Decree in Second Appeal No. 356 of 2001. Applicant Claims Prior Purchase of Suit Land and Alleges Fraud, Suppression, and Violation of Interim Orders.

30 Aug 2016

The applicant filed a civil application seeking recall of an order dated 23.12.2011 by which Second Appeal No.356 of 2001 was disposed of in terms of ...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Plaintiffs' Second Appeal, Holding Sale Deed Executed During Pendency of Partition Suit Hit by Lis Pendens. Sale Transaction Not Binding on Respondents as Plaintiffs Had Knowledge of Pending Suit, and Not Bona Fide Purchasers Under Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

20 Dec 2005

The dispute concerned agricultural land in Gat No.73, village Ardhanari, Mohol Taluka, District Solapur, originally purchased by one Baburao Kapase in...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Chamber Summons to Raise Attachment Under Order 21 Rule 54 CPC — Bona Fide Purchaser for Value Without Notice of Decree Protected. The court held that an attachment order served after the purchaser had paid full consideration and obtained possession is not binding on the purchaser.

6 Apr 2005

The present chamber summons was taken out by the applicant, Rajneesh Agarwal & Associates P. Ltd, seeking to raise an attachment under Order 21 Rule 5...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute Over Auction Sale — Upholds High Court's Finding That Auction Purchaser Was Real Owner, Not a Benami Front. The court held that the plaintiffs failed to prove that the auction purchaser was a benami for the original owner, and the suit was barred under Section 66(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

17 Mar 2020

The plaintiffs, wife and legal heirs of Govindasamy, filed a suit to set aside an auction sale of 1955 and seek possession of the suit property. The s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Interim Application Seeking Ratification of Sale Under Section 536(2) of Companies Act, 1956 — Court Ratifies Sale of Property by Company in Liquidation to Bona Fide Purchaser for Value Without Notice of Winding Up Petition.

10 Jun 2024

The Bombay High Court allowed an interim application filed by the applicant seeking a declaration that the sale agreement dated 5th September 2007 was...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Status Quo Order in Property Dispute — Bonafide Purchaser's Rights Protected. The court set aside the order of the Adhoc District Judge-I directing status quo, holding that the appellant had made out a prima facie case and the balance of convenience was in his favour.

5 Aug 2016

The appellant, Vijay A. Palekar, filed an appeal against an order passed by the learned Adhoc District Judge-I, which directed the appellant and respo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals by Obstructionists in Execution Proceedings — Purchasers During Pendency of Lis Not Bona Fide. Doctrine of Lis Pendens Under Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Applies to Execution Proceedings, and Purchasers During Pendency Are Bound by Decree.

12 Mar 2012

The case involves three second appeals arising from execution proceedings. The respondent decree holders (Respondent Nos.1-3) obtained a compromise de...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Sets Aside Recovery Notices for Sugarcane Purchase Tax and Sales Tax from Auction Purchaser; Petitioner Not Liable for Pre-existing Statutory Dues of Defaulter Sugar Factory. Sale of Secured Assets under SARFAESI Act on 'As Is Where Is' Basis Did Not Include Notice of Tax Dues Absent from Revenue Records at Time of Bid Submission.

1 Aug 2017

The matter arose from a writ petition filed by a sugar factory (petitioner) challenging communications dated 29th November 2016 and 23rd January 2017 ...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Obstruction Application, Upholds Execution Court's Order. Pendente Lite Purchaser Cannot Raise Defense of Bonafide Purchaser; Decree Against Vendor Binds Subsequent Purchaser.

28 Apr 2026

The second appeal arose from execution proceedings in a suit for declaration of title and recovery of possession. The respondent Balan had filed O.S.N...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)