Search Results for "Assessment Year 2003-2004"

18 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 18 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Charge Sheet Against Income Tax Officer for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC. Disciplinary proceedings initiated without prior sanction from the Central Government are invalid as the officer was not removable from service without such sanction.

The petitioner, Shri Nai Pal Singh, an employee of the Income Tax Department working as Commissioner of Income Tax (Departmental Representative), file...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Cooperative Society Entitled to Deduction Under Section 80P(2)(e) on Ginning and Pressing Charges. Reopening of Assessment Based on Change of Opinion Not Justified.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Nagpur against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which upheld the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case. Journal Entry Set-off for Loan Repayment Does Not Violate Section 269T of Income Tax Act, 1961, as It Is Not a Repayment but an Adjustment of Mutual Claims.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which deleted the penalty ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Architect Allowed Deduction Under Section 80O for Foreign Exchange Receipts. Architectural Designs Constitute Intellectual Property Eligible for Deduction Under Section 80O of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case involves an appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Reopening of Assessment in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Fresh Material. Notice under Section 148 issued beyond four years quashed as there was no failure to disclose material facts and the reasons constituted a change of opinion.

The petitioner, Anil Radhakrishna Wani, a solicitor and advocate, was a partner of Little & Company and retired on 30 September 2002. Upon retirement,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Assessments Under Section 148 for Lack of Fresh Material — Deduction Under Section 80IB Allowed After Scrutiny in Original Assessment. Reopening Based on Same Facts Already Examined Under Section 143(3) Amounts to Change of Opinion and Is Invalid.

The petitioner, Purity Techtextile Private Limited, challenged the reopening of its income tax assessments for Assessment Years 2003-2004 and 2004-200...