Search Results for "Article 15(3)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Article 15(3)"

702 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 702 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Constitutional Validity of Criminal Defamation Laws. The Petitioners Contend that Sections 499 and 500 IPC and Section 199 CrPC Violate Fundamental Right to Freedom of Speech and Expression Under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Article 32 of the Constitution, with Subramanian Swamy as the lead petitioner, challengi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Order for Lack of Proper Opportunity of Hearing and Non-Communication of Section 151 Approval in Income Tax Reopening Proceedings. The court held that the Assessing Officer failed to grant a personal hearing as directed by the earlier order of the High Court and did not communicate the approval under Section 151 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, rendering the reassessment invalid.

20 Dec 2024

The petitioner, Wavy Construction LLP, challenged an order dated 14 October 2021 rejecting its objections against reopening of assessment under Sectio...

Supreme Court

"Supreme Court Affirms Need for Minority Establishment in AMU’s Minority Status Dispute" AMU’s Minority Status Under Scrutiny: Establishment by Legislature Versus Minority Founding Rights

8 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court judgment in Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. primarily deals with the issue of minority rights in education, f...

Supreme Court

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

5 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Validates Sub-Classification of Scheduled Castes in Landmark Judgment. Upholding Equality Within Equality: Supreme Court Endorses State's Power to Sub-Classify Scheduled Castes for Targeted Reservation.

1 Aug 2024

The Supreme Court of India, in a significant ruling, has upheld the constitutionality of sub-classifying Scheduled Castes for the purpose of reservati...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions by Offshore Drilling Companies Challenging Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Notices Quashed for Being Time-Barred and Lacking Proper Sanction. Reassessment notices for AY 2014-15 and 2015-16 were issued beyond the four-year time limit under Section 149 without any allegation of failure to disclose material facts, and the sanction under Section 151 was granted without proper application of mind.

4 Aug 2023

The petitioners, Shelf Drilling Ron Tappmeyer Limited, Shelf Drilling J.T. Angel Limited, and Shelf Drilling Trident XII Limited, are companies incorp...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions by Offshore Drilling Companies Challenging Reassessment Notices Under Income Tax Act, 1961 — Section 147 Reassessment Invalid Due to Lack of Jurisdictional Condition Precedent. The court held that reassessment notices were issued without proper application of mind and without valid reasons to believe that income had escaped assessment, and quashed the notices.

4 Aug 2023

The petitioners, Shelf Drilling Ron Tappmeyer Limited, Shelf Drilling J.T. Angel Limited, and Shelf Drilling Trident XII Limited, are companies incorp...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Penalty for Excess Load Consumption as Unauthorised Use of Electricity Under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003 — Assessment at Twice the Higher Tariff Applicable for the Category of Use, Not Consumer's Category. The court held that consumption in excess of connected load constitutes unauthorised use under Explanation (b)(iv) and assessment under Section 126(6) must be at twice the tariff for the category for which electricity was unauthorisedly used.

9 Dec 2022

The case involves a batch of appeals by the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) against a judgment of the Kerala High Court which held that for unau...

High Court

KAHC010159832015_1

15 Dec 2017

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Limitation Case Under Section 144C. Nagarathna J. Holds That Section 144C Does Not Extend Limitation Under Section 153 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

1 Jan 1970

This separate opinion by Nagarathna J. arises from civil appeals filed by the Revenue against a common order of the Bombay High Court. The High Court ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)