Search Results for "Andheri East"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Andheri East"

688 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 688 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses/Allows Petitions in JVPD Scheme Open Space Dispute — MHADA's Authority to Convert Garden Plots to Residential Use under Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority Act, 1976 Addressed. Detailed Legal Issues Including Consent Terms and Maintainability of Appeal Not Decided.

19 Jul 2017

This common judgment deals with two writ petitions concerning the protection of open spaces in the Juhu Vile Parle Development Scheme (JVPD Scheme) at...

High Court

WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 2317 OF 2019

19 Dec 2019

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Property Tax Reassessment Under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 — Reassessment Based on Capital Value Method Without Proper Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Set Aside. Court Held That Reassessment Must Be Based on Fair Market Value as on 1st April 2010 and Not on Arbitrary Valuation.

29 Jul 2019

The petitioners, residents of Narsinha Prasad Building and Narsinha Prasad Annex Building in Vile Parle (East), Mumbai, challenged the reassessment of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Developer's Petition in Amenity Space Computation Dispute — D.P. Road Area Must Be Adjusted Against Total Amenity Space Under DCR 57(4)(c)(ii). The court held that the Municipal Corporation's refusal to sanction plans based on a misinterpretation of DCR 57(4)(c)(ii) and Note II was arbitrary and unsustainable.

5 Sep 2023

The petitioner, Atul Projects India Pvt Ltd, a developer, owned a plot of land in Mumbai and submitted development plans to the Municipal Corporation ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates PIL and Writ Petitions on Hoarding Permissions on Airport Land. Petitioners Allege Non-Compliance with MMC Act, 1888 Sections 328 and 328A and CRZ Regulations.

1 Mar 2018

A public interest litigation and two writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the erection of hoardings by an advertising co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses/Allows Petition Challenging MIDC's Allotment of Amenity Plots and Regulations 2009 – Judgment Truncated. Incomplete text prevents determination of outcome.

29 Mar 2019

The petitioner, an industrial association of small scale industries, filed writ petitions challenging the allotment of open spaces or amenity plots wi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Eviction Notices under Slum Act in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute. Petitioners Challenged Eviction Notices Issued under Sections 33 and 38 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971, Alleging Lack of Section 3C(1) Declaration.

26 Apr 2006

The matter arose from a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by Om-Sai Darshan Cooperative Housing Society (Proposed) an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Restrains MMRDA from Taking Coercive Actions in Writ Petition Challenging Penalty Demand for Construction Delay; Lease Deed Clauses on Time Limit and Additional Built-Up Area Interpreted

20 Nov 2019

The petitioners, Raghuleela Builders Private Limited and Reliance Industries Limited, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Aarey Colony Development as Forest Land — Held That Aarey Colony Is Not a Forest Under the Forest Conservation Act, 1980, and That the State Government Has Discretion to Use Land for Public Purposes. The court ruled that the dictionary meaning of 'forest' does not apply to Aarey Colony, and the petitioners failed to establish that it is a forest requiring prior approval under Section 2 of the Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

4 Oct 2019

The petitioners, Vanashakti (a public trust) and four individuals, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Disposes of Challenge to Sections 17(2) and 32(1) Proviso of MMRDA Act by Consent. Land Acquisition by MMRDA Under Challenge: Petitioners Allege Unconstitutional Provisions in MMRDA Act, 1974.

15 Nov 2019

The Bombay High Court heard and disposed of a group of matters comprising Writ Petition No. 841 of 2012, Public Interest Litigation No. 3 of 2011, and...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)