Search Results for "1894"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "1894"

1738 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1738 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Trial Court's Order Refusing Amendment in Land Acquisition Reference, Permits Inclusion of Mango Tree Claim. Amendment Sought Six Years After Filing of Reference Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Allowed as Pragmatic View Required to Subserve Ends of Justice.

24 Feb 2018

The case arose from a land acquisition proceeding in which the petitioner's land was acquired, and he filed a reference under Section 18 of the Land A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Resettlement of Project Affected Persons Under Maharashtra Resettlement Act. Court Holds That Written Family Arrangement Without Registered Partition Deed Does Not Constitute Lawful Partition and Thus Individual Holdings Cannot Be Deemed Below Eight Acres to Exempt from Acquisition.

18 Aug 2005

The Bombay High Court heard two writ petitions together challenging land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Maharashtra for the resettl...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Subsequent Purchaser Cannot Invoke Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act. The Court held that a person who purchases land after the acquisition process is complete has no locus standi to claim lapse of acquisition under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

18 May 2023

The case involves an appeal by the Government of NCT of Delhi against an order of the High Court of Delhi allowing a writ petition filed by the respon...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Under 1894 Act — Section 24(2) of 2013 Act Not Applicable as Award Passed Before 2013 Act Commencement. The court held that acquisition proceedings culminating with an award dated 04.03.1999 under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 cannot be challenged under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

24 Mar 2026

The petitioners, Savitaben Wd/o Narsinhbhai Somabhai Padhiyar and another, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution bef...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Railway Project. Publication in Official Gazette and Local Newspapers Held Sufficient Compliance Under Section 4(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, 70 individuals, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the acquisition of their lands for t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Land Owner's Petition for Rental Compensation Prior to Section 4 Notification in Land Acquisition Case. Possession Lost Before Notification Does Not Entitle Owner to Additional Compensation Under Section 34 or Rental Compensation Under Government Policy.

15 Dec 2014

The petitioner, Tukaram Maruti Pawar, was a land owner whose land was acquired by the State of Maharashtra for a minor irrigation project. He lost pos...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition Notifications Under Section 24 of 2013 Act — Possession Taken and Compensation Paid Under 1894 Act Precludes Lapse. Acquisition of land for a cooperative housing society upheld as possession was taken and compensation paid before the 2013 Act came into force.

24 Jun 2015

The petitioners, owners of land measuring 2 acres in Sy.No.7 and 1 acre in Sy.No.9 of Gubbalala village, Bangalore South Taluk, challenged the acquisi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Acquisition Award for Non-Compliance with 2013 Act — Mandamus Issued for Fresh Award Under Section 26. Land Acquisition Proceedings Initiated Under 1894 Act but Award Passed After 2013 Act Came into Force Must Comply with Compensation Provisions of 2013 Act.

29 Aug 2023

The petitioner, M/s. Deco Equipments Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash an awar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Land Acquisition Case Due to Non-Communication of Award Under Section 12(2) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Proceedings Lapse Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 as Award Not Communicated Before New Act Came Into Force.

4 Aug 2016

The petitioners, Jitesh Bhaiyalal Sahu and Rashmi Jitesh Sahu, owned 1.95 hectares of land in Mouza Morangana, Amravati. The State initiated acquisiti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Lack of Notice Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Co-owners Not Served Individual Notice Before Acquisition for Irrigation Project, Violating Section 4(1) and Section 9(3) of the 1894 Act.

2 Jan 2024

The case involves a writ petition filed by three co-owners of agricultural land in Village Nere, Taluka Maval, District Pune, challenging the acquisit...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)