Search Results for "164 CrPC statement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "164 CrPC statement"

380 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 380 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Pronounces Judgment on Criminal Writ Petition Filed by Sitting MLA to Quash FIR for Alleged Assault, Wrongful Restraint and Criminal Intimidation. Petitioner Contends that Ingredients of Sections 323, 341 and 506 IPC Are Not Made Out and Investigation Is Politically Motivated.

21 Dec 2021

The petitioner, a sitting Member of the Goa Legislative Assembly, filed a criminal writ petition seeking to quash FIR No. 18/2020 and charge sheet No....

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Criminal Petition Seeking Redaction of Deposition in POCSO Case. Statement Under Section 164 CrPC Held Not Substantive Evidence; Reference by Witness in Deposition to Prior Statement Permissible for Contradiction/Corroboration Only.

13 Sep 2024

The petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, was filed by the accused in a POCSO case seeking redaction of a portion of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Cross-Examination on Section 164 CrPC Statements in POCSO Case — Trial Court's Unilateral Exhibition of Statements Without Opportunity to Cross-Examine Violates Fair Trial Principles. Accused entitled to recall witnesses for cross-examination on their Section 164 statements to ensure fair trial.

23 Aug 2021

The petitioner, Vinod s/o Vikram Paithankar, is facing trial in Special Case (child) No. 10 of 2018 for offences under Sections 376(2)(i), 323 read wi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaint Against Company Directors Due to Section 195(1)(b)(i) CrPC Bar. Allegations of Filing False Affidavits and Documents in Court Proceedings Required Court's Written Complaint, Not Private Complaint Under Section 156(3).

16 Aug 2018

The dispute arose from a criminal complaint filed by Shree Hari Rice & Agro Ltd. (respondent no.1) against M/s Lan Eseda Industries Ltd. (petitioner) ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 302 IPC, Clarifying Weight of Section 164 CrPC Statements. Court Holds That Prior Recording of Statement Under Section 164 CrPC Does Not Automatically Render Trial Evidence Suspect But Requires Caution.

1 Mar 1968

This appeal by special leave arose from the Allahabad High Court's confirmation of convictions under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Pe...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Accused's Petition for Copy of Victim's Video Recorded Statement Under Section 164 Cr.P.C. — Quashes Sessions Court Order Rejecting Application Under Section 207 Cr.P.C. The court held that the accused is entitled to a copy of the video recorded statement as part of the documents to be furnished under Section 207 Cr.P.C., and the Sessions Court's reliance on Dinesh @ Budha v. State of Rajasthan was misplaced as that case dealt with evidentiary value, not the right to receive copies.

6 Feb 2018

The petitioner, Basavaraju M U, is the accused in Sessions Case No. 62/2017 pending before the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Chikkamagaluru. ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court Order Directing Supply of Section 164 CrPC Statement to Accused in Sexual Exploitation Case. The Court held that the accused is not entitled to a copy of the victim's Section 164 statement during investigation, as it may jeopardize safety and hamper investigation.

1 Jan 2020

The case arises from a complaint by the father of the appellant (Miss 'A') alleging that she was sexually exploited by Respondent No.2 and others. The...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Criminal Writ Petition Challenging Examination of Complainant After Recording of Accused’s Statement Under Section 313 CrPC, Holds Section 311 CrPC Allows Summoning of Witness at Any Stage of Trial. Court Rules That Fair Trial Encompasses Interests of Victim and Society, and That No Prejudice Is Caused to Accused as They Would Get Opportunity to Cross-Examine and Further 313 Statement Could Be Recorded.

10 Feb 2005

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard a criminal writ petition filed by four accused persons challenging an order of the Additional Sessions Ju...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court Order Refusing to Summon Witness as Additional Accused Under Section 319 Cr.P.C. in Murder Trial. Court Holds That Proviso to Section 132 of Evidence Act Does Not Bar Proceeding Under Section 319, and Statement Under Section 164 Cr.P.C. Can Be Considered for Forming Opinion.

31 Jul 2026

The present appeal arose from the refusal by the trial court and the High Court to summon a prosecution witness as an additional accused under Section...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes FIR in Rape Case Due to Consensual Relationship and Absence of Promise of Marriage. Allegations under Sections 376(2)(n) and 506 IPC Failed to Disclose Cognizable Offence as Relationship Was Voluntary and Prolonged.

4 Dec 2024

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Prashant against the State of NCT of Delhi, challenging the Delhi High Court's order dated 16.10.2023 th...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)