Supreme Court Upholds Arbitration Proceedings After Setting Aside Initial Award — Clarifies Scope of Section 19 of Arbitration Act, 1940.

  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from a contract for the supply of corn sacks entered into on August 29, 1951, which included an arbitration clause. Disputes regarding the contract were referred to the Bengal Chamber of Commerce for arbitration. An initial award made on April 17, 1952, was set aside by the High Court on May 25, 1953, due to misconduct by the arbitrators. Following this, the respondent sought to refer the matter for arbitration de novo, leading to the appointment of a new tribunal that issued a fresh award in favor of the respondent. The appellant challenged this second award, arguing that the reference to arbitration was exhausted after the first award was set aside, rendering the arbitrator functus officio without a new arbitration agreement. The court analyzed the provisions of the Arbitration Act, 1940, particularly Section 19, which grants the court discretion to either supersede the reference or allow it to continue even after an award is set aside. The court concluded that the reference had not been superseded, and thus, the arbitration agreement remained effective, allowing for further proceedings. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the validity of the second arbitration award.

Headnote

A) Arbitration Law - Function of Arbitrator - Functus Officio - Arbitration Act, 1940, Section 19 - The court held that while an arbitrator becomes functus officio after making an award, this does not preclude further arbitration proceedings if the award is set aside and the reference is not superseded. The discretion of the court under Section 19 allows for the continuation of arbitration proceedings depending on the terms of the arbitration agreement (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the reference to arbitration was exhausted after the first award was set aside and if a second reference to arbitration was permissible.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed both appeals, affirming the validity of the second arbitration award and clarifying the discretion of the court under Section 19 of the Arbitration Act, 1940.

Law Points

  • arbitration
  • functus officio
  • reference to arbitration
  • setting aside award
  • discretion of court
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

Civil Appeal No. 309 and 526 of 59

1961-12-12

K. N. Wanchoo, J.C. Shah

N. O. Chatterjee, B. P. Malieshwar, H. N. Sanyal, S. K. Gupta, D. N. Mukherjee, N. G. Chatterjee, M. G. Poddar, S. N. Mukherjee, A. N. Sinha, P. K. Mukherjee

Juggilal Kamlapat

General Fibre Dealers Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Dispute regarding arbitration proceedings following the setting aside of an initial award.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to set aside the second award and declare the arbitration agreement null.

Filing Reason

Disputes arose from a contract for the supply of corn sacks.

Previous Decisions

The initial award was set aside by the High Court due to misconduct.

Issues

Whether the reference to arbitration was exhausted after the first award was set aside. Whether a second reference to arbitration was permissible without a new arbitration agreement.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the arbitrator became functus officio after the first award was set aside, preventing further arbitration. The respondent contended that the reference was not superseded and sought to continue arbitration proceedings.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that an arbitrator becomes functus officio after making an award, but this does not preclude further arbitration proceedings if the award is set aside and the reference is not superseded, as per Section 19 of the Arbitration Act, 1940.

Judgment Excerpts

Held, that the arbitrator became functus officio after he gave the award but that did not mean that in no circumstances could there be further arbitration proceedings. Section 19 of the Arbitration Act empowered the Court not to supersede the reference and to leave the arbitration agreement effective even when it set aside the award.

Procedural History

The initial award was made on April 17, 1952, set aside on May 25, 1953, followed by a second reference for arbitration leading to a new award on March 1, 1955, which was challenged in the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Arbitration Act, 1940: 19
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Student for Assaulting Invigilator Under Section 332 IPC. Invigilator Held to be a Public Servant Discharging Duty During Examination.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal Reducing Compensation in Land Acquisition for Tillari Irrigation Project. Market Value of Acquired Land Determined at Rs. 50 per sq. metre Using Belting Method and Comparable Sales Under Land Acquisition Act, 18...