High Court Adjourns Appeal for Amicable Settlement and Substitution of Parties. The court provided a last chance for the parties to explore settlement options and required the presence of parties at the next hearing.

  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a first appeal pending in the High Court of Gujarat since 1985, concerning a dispute between the parties. The court noted the prolonged nature of the litigation and decided to adjourn the matter to 23.12.2019, providing a last opportunity for the parties to explore an amicable settlement. The court instructed the advocates for both sides to facilitate discussions regarding a potential resolution and mandated the presence of the parties at the next hearing. Additionally, the court required the appellant's advocate to provide information regarding the demise of a respondent for necessary substitution. The decision aimed to promote justice and encourage resolution outside of court proceedings.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Adjournment of Appeal - Last Chance for Settlement - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Order 22 - The court adjourned the appeal pending since 1985 to allow parties to explore amicable settlement and directed the presence of parties on the next date. Held that the adjournment serves the interest of justice and facilitates potential resolution (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the matters should be adjourned for exploring amicable settlement and substitution of deceased respondent.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court adjourned the appeal to 23.12.2019, allowing both parties to explore the possibility of an amicable settlement and required their presence at the next hearing.

Law Points

  • Adjournment
  • Amicable Settlement
  • Substitution of Parties
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

C/FA/1313/1985

2019-12-12

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.P.DHOLARIA

MR SAURABH G AMIN, NANAVATI ASSOCIATES, DECEASED LITIGANT, JENIL M SHAH, MR AJ YAGNIK, MR RM DESAI, MS MEGHA JANI

MOGHIBAI WIDOW OF MADHAVDAS RAVJI & 7 other(s)

SHANTIBEN WD/O DECEASED CHHABILDAS RAVJI & 34 other(s)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal pending since 1985.

Remedy Sought

Adjournment for exploring amicable settlement.

Issues

Adjournment for settlement Substitution of deceased respondent

Submissions/Arguments

Advocates for both sides to explore settlement Information regarding deceased respondent for substitution

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the importance of exploring amicable resolutions in prolonged litigation.

Judgment Excerpts

In the interest of justice, as a last chance, the matters are adjourned to 23.12.2019. Learned advocate for the appellant shall come with the information as regards sad demise of respondent for substituting thereof.

Procedural History

The appeal was pending since 1985, with multiple civil applications filed for various purposes.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order 22
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Tribunals National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Upholds Cancellation of Registration of Insolvency Professional Due to Procedural Violations. The Appellant's failure to maintain proper records and obtain necessary instructions led to the cancellation of his ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. The court held that the trial court's acquittal was not perverse as the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt u...