High Court Upholds Decree in Civil Suit and Seeks Verification of Pending Status. Court directed registry to confirm the status of the suit after noting a prior decree and pending service of summons.

High Court: Bombay High Court
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose in Suit No. 816 of 1989 between Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. Ltd. as the plaintiff and The Deccan Co-operative Urban Bank Ltd & Anr. as defendants. The court noted that a writ of summons had been served to the first defendant, while the status of the second defendant's service was still pending verification. The court referred to an earlier order dated 09th October 1992, which indicated that the suit had already been decreed. The registry was instructed to confirm whether the suit remained pending and to report back by the next scheduled date. The matter was set for further directions on 12th November 2008, emphasizing the need for clarity regarding the suit's status following the prior decree.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Service of Summons - Verification of Service - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - The court directed the registry to verify the service of summons to the second defendant and report on the status of the suit, which was previously decreed. Held that clarity on the suit's status is necessary for further proceedings (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the suit is pending despite a prior decree.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court directed the registry to verify the service of summons to the second defendant and report on the status of the suit, which was previously decreed.

Law Points

  • Civil procedure
  • service of summons
  • decree confirmation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

Suit No. 816 of 1989

2008-10-20

A.S. Oka

Rajiv Jadhav, Y.R. Shah

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil suit regarding a decree status.

Previous Decisions

Suit was previously decreed on 09th October 1992.

Issues

Status of the suit post-decree Verification of service of summons

Submissions/Arguments

Plaintiff's counsel noted the decree and service of summons. Court sought verification of the second defendant's service.

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the importance of confirming the status of a suit that has been decreed to ensure proper legal proceedings.

Judgment Excerpts

The registry to verify whether the suit is pending and submit a report by next date. I find that there is an order dated 09th October 1992 passed by this Court which shows that the suit is already decreed.

Procedural History

The suit was filed in 1989, and a decree was granted on 09th October 1992. The court reviewed the status of the suit on 20th October 2008.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Employer in Industrial Dispute Case — Upholds Workman's Right to Reinstatement. The Tribunal's rejection of the dismissal application rendered the order void, obligating the employer to treat the workman as continuing in ser...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Promotions in Aviation Research Centre Due to Delay in Filing. Delay in Asserting Claims Invalidates Petitioners' Challenge to Promotions Granted to Deputationists.