Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Rent Control Case — Upholds Controller's Jurisdiction. The Controller's decision regarding non-payment of rent is final and cannot be challenged in civil court under Section 11 of the Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1947.

  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal from a judgment of the Patna High Court which reversed a decree of a Subordinate Judge regarding the eviction of tenants for non-payment of rent under the Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1947. The respondents were monthly tenants of the appellants and had fallen into arrears for several months. After the appellants refused to accept cheques for the overdue rent, the respondents sent the payment via postal money order. The appellants subsequently applied to the House Controller for eviction, claiming non-payment of rent. The Controller ordered eviction, which was upheld by the Commissioner on appeal. The respondents filed a suit to declare the Controller's order illegal, which was initially dismissed by the Munsif but later decreed by the High Court. The High Court held that the Controller's order was without jurisdiction as there was no established non-payment of rent. The appellants contended that the Controller had the authority to determine non-payment and that his decision was final. The Supreme Court analyzed the provisions of the Act, emphasizing that the Controller's jurisdiction included determining non-payment of rent and that his decisions were not subject to civil court review. The Court concluded that the High Court's interpretation was incorrect and restored the Controller's order, allowing the appeal and awarding costs to the appellants.

Headnote

A) Rent Control - Jurisdiction of Controller - Finality of Decision - Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1947, Section 11 - The Controller has the jurisdiction to determine non-payment of rent and order eviction; his decision cannot be questioned in civil court. The court held that the Controller's order for eviction, even if allegedly based on a wrong decision regarding non-payment, is final and cannot be challenged in civil proceedings (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Controller's decision regarding non-payment of rent can be questioned in a civil court.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the judgment and decree of the High Court, and restored the decree of the courts below, .

Law Points

  • jurisdiction of Controller
  • non-payment of rent
  • eviction under rent control
  • finality of Controller's decision
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

A.S. 2280 of 1948

1951-02-02

Saiyid Fazl Ali, Mehar Chand Mahajan, Mukherjea, Chandrasekhara Aiyar

Baldev Sahay, T. K. Prasad, N. C. Chatterjee, H. F. Umrigar

Rai Brij Raj Krishna and Another

S. K. Shaw and Brothers

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal regarding eviction order under rent control legislation.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought to uphold the eviction order issued by the Controller.

Filing Reason

Respondents challenged the Controller's order claiming it was without jurisdiction due to alleged non-payment of rent.

Previous Decisions

The suit was initially dismissed by the Munsif and upheld by the appellate court, but reversed by the High Court.

Issues

Whether the Controller's decision regarding non-payment of rent can be questioned in a civil court.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the Controller's decision on non-payment was final and could not be challenged in civil court. Respondents contended that there was no established non-payment of rent, thus the eviction order was invalid.

Ratio Decidendi

The Controller has jurisdiction to determine non-payment of rent and his decision is final, not subject to civil court review under the Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1947.

Judgment Excerpts

The appeals fail and are dismissed with costs, only one set in all of them together. The Controller has the jurisdiction to determine whether there is non-payment of rent or not, as well as the jurisdiction, on finding that there is non-payment of rent, to order eviction of a tenant.

Procedural History

The appeal was from a judgment and decree of the Patna High Court dated 25th March, 1949, reversing an appellate decree of the Subordinate Judge in Suit No. 62 of 1948.

Acts & Sections

  • Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act: Section 11
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Part, Upholds Arbitrator's Jurisdiction on Extra Work Claim and Interest Pendente Lite. Arbitrator's Award for Extra Earth Work Is Within Scope of Reference; Interest Pendente Lite Permissible but Pre-Reference Interest...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unlawful Assembly and Common Objection Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish that the appella...