NCLAT Dismisses Company Petition for Lack of Prosecution and Allows Amendment. The tribunal dismissed the Company Petition due to the applicant's inaction in amending the memo of parties despite being granted time. The court enforced its earlier order allowing the amendment of the memo of parties under the Companies Act, 2013.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved Antariksh Softech Pvt Ltd and others as applicants against D - Vois SSV Broadband Pvt Ltd and others as respondents. The litigation arose from a Company Petition that was dismissed by the NCLT for lack of prosecution due to the applicant's failure to amend the memo of parties after a merger. The NCLT had previously granted time for the amendment but noted that no action was taken by the applicant. The tribunal dismissed the petition, stating that the applicant showed no interest in pursuing the matter. Subsequently, the NCLAT extended the time for filing the amended memo of parties by four weeks, allowing the applicant to comply with the order. However, the applicant later filed a restoration application after the NCLT dismissed the Company Petition. The NCLT allowed the restoration application but stated that it could not take further action due to the existing order from the NCLAT. The NCLAT then reviewed the situation, allowing the amended petition to be taken on record and directing the filing of a separate amendment memo within two weeks. The tribunal emphasized that it was enforcing its earlier order and not creating any new rights. The application was ultimately disposed of, and the matter was scheduled for further listing.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Dismissal for Want of Prosecution - Dismissal of Company Petition - Companies Act, 2013 - The Company Petition was dismissed due to the applicant's failure to amend the memo of parties despite being granted time. The court noted the lack of interest from the petitioner to pursue the matter, leading to dismissal for want of prosecution (Paras 2-2).

B) Company Law - Amendment of Parties - Extension for Filing Amended Memo of Parties - Companies Act, 2013 - The tribunal allowed an extension for filing the amended memo of parties but warned that failure to comply would result in withdrawal of the concession. The applicant was permitted to file the amended memo within four weeks (Paras 3-3).

C) Company Law - Restoration Application - Consideration of Restoration Application - Companies Act, 2013 - The tribunal considered the restoration application but noted that the NCLT had already issued directions regarding the amended memo. The application was allowed to enforce the earlier order of the tribunal (Paras 4-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Company Petition should be dismissed for lack of prosecution and whether the applicant should be allowed to amend the memo of parties.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The NCLAT dismissed the Company Petition for lack of prosecution and allowed the applicant to file the amended memo of parties within two weeks.

Law Points

  • Company law
  • amendment of parties
  • dismissal for want of prosecution
  • restoration application
  • compliance with tribunal orders
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (10) 92

IA NO.3597/2026 in Company Appeal (AT) NO.298 OF 2025

2026-10-09

Justice Yogesh Khanna, Mr. Barun Mitra, Mr. Ajai Das Mehrotra

Mr. Krishnendu Datta, Mr. Vaisal G, Mr. Chandresh Rao, Mr. K Gaurav Kumar, Mr. S. Kishandan

Antariksh Softech Pvt Ltd & Anr

D - Vois SSV Broadband Pvt Ltd & Ors

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Company law dispute regarding the dismissal of a Company Petition and amendment of parties.

Remedy Sought

The applicant sought clarification and extension of time to amend the memo of parties.

Filing Reason

The Company Petition was dismissed for lack of prosecution due to failure to amend the memo of parties.

Previous Decisions

The NCLT dismissed the Company Petition and the NCLAT extended the time for filing the amended memo.

Issues

Whether the Company Petition should be dismissed for lack of prosecution Whether the applicant should be allowed to amend the memo of parties

Submissions/Arguments

The applicant argued for an extension to amend the memo of parties The respondent contended that the court had become functus officio

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal emphasized the importance of compliance with procedural orders and the consequences of inaction in pursuing a Company Petition.

Judgment Excerpts

The Company Petition which is pending since 2021 is dismissed for want of prosecution. The application is allowed.

Procedural History

The Company Petition was filed and dismissed by the NCLT for lack of prosecution. The NCLAT extended the time for amendment and considered a restoration application, ultimately allowing the amended petition to be taken on record.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 2013:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Allows Appeal in RERA Case for Delay in Possession — Promoter Liable for Interest Under Section 18 of RERA Act, 2016. The court restored the order of TN RERA directing the promoter to pay interest for delay in handing over possess...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Clarifies Application of Disability Pension Judgment for Ex-Servicemen. Court held that the common judgment on disability pension claims cannot be applied mechanically to all cases, emphasizing that each claim must be evaluated on its o...