NCLAT Revives Section 9 Application Dismissed for Non-Prosecution. Tribunal Sets Aside Dismissal Order and Directs Fresh Consideration of the Application Under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by Alta Performance Materials India LLP against an order dated 17.02.2026, where the Adjudicating Authority (AA) dismissed their application under Section 9 of the Code of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 for non-prosecution. The appellant contended that they had been actively pursuing the proceedings and that the AA's observation regarding their lack of interest was incorrect, noting that their counsel was present during the hearing. The appellant also highlighted discussions regarding a repayment schedule with the Corporate Debtor (CD), arguing that disagreement over this schedule should not lead to dismissal of the application. The respondent's counsel suggested that the matter should be sent back to the AA for fresh consideration. The Tribunal, upon reviewing the submissions, decided to set aside the AA's order and revive the Section 9 application, instructing that the AA should dispose of the application promptly without any adjournments requested by the appellant. The Tribunal clarified that it was not expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Section 9 Application - Dismissal for Non-Prosecution - Code of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 9 - The appeal challenged the dismissal of a Section 9 application for non-prosecution, asserting that the appellant was actively pursuing the matter. The Tribunal set aside the dismissal and revived the application, directing the Adjudicating Authority to consider it afresh without expressing any opinion on the merits (Paras 1-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the order dismissing the Section 9 application for non-prosecution should be set aside.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal set aside the order dated 17.02.2026, revived the Section 9 application, and directed the AA to dispose of the application at an early date without any adjournments requested by the appellant.

Law Points

  • Section 9 application
  • non-prosecution
  • fresh consideration
  • revival of application
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (05) 86

Comp. App. (AT) (Ins) No. 497 of 2026

2026-05-22

Justice Ashok Bhushan, Mr. Barun Mitra

Mr. Vishesh Kalra, Deepak Saxena, Simran Shadiya, Mr. Vikrant Yadav, Rajiv Kumar

Alta Performance Materials India LLP

CMT Mechanised System Pvt. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against dismissal of Section 9 application for non-prosecution.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought revival of the Section 9 application.

Filing Reason

The AA dismissed the application for non-prosecution.

Previous Decisions

The AA had previously dismissed the application on 17.02.2026.

Issues

Whether the dismissal of the Section 9 application for non-prosecution was justified? Should the application be revived for fresh consideration?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that they were actively pursuing the case and the AA's dismissal was incorrect. Respondent suggested that the matter should be reconsidered by the AA.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal emphasized the importance of allowing parties to pursue their applications and the need for fresh consideration by the AA in cases of dismissal for non-prosecution.

Judgment Excerpts

This appeal has been filed against the order dated 17.02.2026 by which order, the AA has dismissed the application filed under Section 9 of the Code for non - prosecution. In view of the aforesaid, we set aside the order of 17.02.2026 revive Section 9 application.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed against the dismissal order of the AA dated 17.02.2026, which was challenged by the appellant.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Section 9
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaint Against Food Business Operators in Lozenges Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling and Analysis Procedures Under FSS Act, 2006. The Court held that failure to follow Sections 42 and 43 of the F...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Husband's Petition for Joint Custody of Minor Daughter in Family Court Dispute — Emphasizes Welfare of Child as Paramount Consideration Under Guardian and Wards Act, 1890. The court set aside the Family Court's order ...