NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Dismisses Appeal as Withdrawn — Application for Maintainability Heard. The Tribunal allowed the withdrawal of the appeal due to its infructuous nature after the maintainability application was reserved for orders.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose in the context of a company petition pending before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) involving N.K. Proteins Pvt. Ltd. as the appellant and the Union of India through the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) as the respondent. The appellant filed an application, I.A. No. 931 of 2020, concerning the maintainability of the company petition. The impugned order dated 20.06.2024 directed the withdrawal of this application. During the hearing on 08.05.2026, the appellant's counsel submitted that since the application had been finally heard and was reserved for orders, the appeal had become infructuous and requested permission to withdraw it. The Tribunal also heard the counsel for the Union of India. Ultimately, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn and disposed of the pending interim applications. The Tribunal clarified that the order directing the withdrawal of I.A. No. 931 of 2020 would not impede the decision on that application. The final decision was that the appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Withdrawal of Appeal - Dismissal of Appeal as Withdrawn - Companies Act, 2013 - The appellant sought to withdraw the appeal as the application regarding maintainability had been finally heard and reserved for orders, rendering the appeal infructuous. The Tribunal allowed the withdrawal of the appeal and dismissed it accordingly, ensuring that the withdrawal order would not affect the pending application. Held that the appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn (Paras 3-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appeal should be allowed to withdraw due to the infructuous nature of the application.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn and disposed of the pending interim applications.

Law Points

  • Withdrawal of appeal
  • Maintainability of company petition
  • Disposition of interim applications
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (05) 81

I.A. No. 3329 of 2026 in Company Appeal (AT) No. 160 of 2025

2026-05-08

Justice Yogesh Khanna, Mr. Ajai Das Mehrotra

Mr. Krishnendu Datta, Raheel Patel, Mr. Himanshu Satija, Mr. Anshul Rao, Mr. Shiva Lakshmi

N.K. Proteins Pvt. Ltd.

Union of India, Through SFIO

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal regarding the maintainability of a company petition.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought to withdraw the appeal.

Filing Reason

The application regarding maintainability had been finally heard and reserved for orders.

Previous Decisions

The impugned order directed the withdrawal of application I.A. No. 931 of 2020.

Issues

Whether the appeal should be allowed to withdraw due to its infructuous nature.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant's counsel argued that the appeal had become infructuous and should be allowed to withdraw. The counsel for the Union of India was also present during the hearing.

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn due to the infructuous nature of the application regarding maintainability, ensuring that the withdrawal would not affect the pending application.

Judgment Excerpts

Considering the submissions, the I.A. No. 3329 of 2026 is allowed and the appeal is taken up for hearing. The appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. The impugned order which directs the withdrawal of application I.A. No. 931 of 2020 shall not come in the way in deciding the said application.

Procedural History

The appeal was taken up for early hearing on 08.05.2026 after the impugned order dated 20.06.2024 was reviewed.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 2013:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Dismisses Application for Rejection of Plaint in Commercial Suit Due to Jurisdictional Bar. The Court Held that Claims Relating to Sub-lease Rights Fall Under the Small Causes Court's Jurisdiction as per Section 41(1) of the Presidency Sma...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application in Civil Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Perpetual Injunction — Court Holds That Application for Appointment of Commissioner Under Order 26 Rule 9 CPC Cannot Be Rejected on Grounds of Delay or Sta...