NCLAT Remands Insolvency Matter for Settlement Process and IRP Remuneration Determination. The Tribunal directed the Adjudicating Authority to ensure IRP's remuneration is fixed and paid before proceeding with settlement withdrawal under Section 12A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal concerning insolvency proceedings initiated against S.A. Consultants & Forwarders Pvt. Ltd. The appellant, Yasir Kharwa, sought to withdraw the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) following a settlement of outstanding disputes related to debt and default. The Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) reported that no claims had been received except for a show cause notice from the EPFO, indicating that the parties had resolved their disputes. The Tribunal noted that before any decision on the withdrawal of CIRP could be made, the remuneration of the IRP needed to be determined and settled. Consequently, the Tribunal remanded the matter back to the Adjudicating Authority to facilitate the settlement process and directed that the funds available in the case be transferred to the relevant account before the NCLT. The interim protection previously granted was to continue until further orders from the Adjudicating Authority, which was also given the liberty to modify the interim order to enable the settlement process. The Tribunal's decision emphasized the importance of ensuring the IRP's remuneration is addressed prior to finalizing the settlement.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Settlement Withdrawal - Procedure for Settlement - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 12A - The IRP reported no claims received and noted that parties settled outstanding disputes, necessitating the determination of IRP's remuneration before proceeding with settlement withdrawal. The Tribunal remanded the matter to the Adjudicating Authority to facilitate the settlement process and ensure IRP's remuneration is fixed and paid. Held that the appeal is disposed of with directions for settlement (Paras 2-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the matter should proceed under Section 12A for settlement withdrawal of CIRP.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal disposed of the appeal and remanded the matter back to the Adjudicating Authority to enable the settlement process, ensuring the IRP's remuneration is fixed and paid. The interim protection granted previously was to continue until further orders.

Law Points

  • Insolvency proceedings
  • settlement withdrawal
  • IRP remuneration
  • interim protection
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (05) 15

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 928 of 2024

2026-05-29

Justice N. Seshasayee, Arun Baroka

Mr. Pratyush Bhattacharjee, Mr. Pervinder, Mr. Avinash Bhati

Yasir Kharwa

S.A. Consultants & Forwarders Pvt. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Insolvency proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.

Remedy Sought

Withdrawal of CIRP and settlement of disputes.

Filing Reason

Parties settled outstanding disputes related to debt and default.

Issues

Whether the matter should proceed under Section 12A for settlement withdrawal of CIRP.

Submissions/Arguments

The IRP reported no claims received and noted that parties settled outstanding disputes. The Tribunal emphasized the need to fix and pay the IRP's remuneration before proceeding.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal held that the determination of the IRP's remuneration is a prerequisite for proceeding with the settlement withdrawal under Section 12A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Judgment Excerpts

The IRP has filed his report and submitted that, except for the show cause notice from the EPFO, he has not received any claim form any parties. Given the scenario, it is now evident that the matter should take Sec. 12A route. Accordingly, we dispose of this appeal and remand the matter back to the Adjudicating Authority to enable it to proceed with the settlement.

Procedural History

The IRP filed a report regarding claims and outstanding disputes, leading to the appeal for withdrawal of CIRP and determination of IRP's remuneration.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Section 12A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petition for Lack of Standing as Non-Party. Order XLIII Rules 1 & 2 CPC bar review by a person who was not a party to the original writ petition.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Dismisses Appeals Regarding Compensation Valuation. The court upheld the earlier determination of fair market value for land acquisition under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, affirming the compensation amount of Rs.10/- per s...