National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Dismisses Appeal Against Non-Final Order. The Tribunal ruled that the appeal was premature as the Adjudicating Authority's order was not final and the application was still pending.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal filed by the Resolution Professional for Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Ltd. against an order dated 07.05.2026 issued by the National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi. The order was related to an interim application filed by Evergreens Leisure Club & Resorts LLP, which was still pending decision. The Appellant challenged the order, asserting that they had filed another application seeking possession of assets from the Respondent, who was in possession of those assets. The Tribunal noted that the order from the Adjudicating Authority was not final and that the application was yet to be decided. It emphasized that the Appellant could request the Adjudicating Authority to consider their application while deciding the pending matter. Consequently, the Tribunal found no reason to entertain the appeal at that stage and disposed of it accordingly.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Appeal Against Non-Final Order - Dismissal of Appeal - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - The appeal was filed against an order that was not final and the application was still pending before the Adjudicating Authority. The Tribunal held that it is open for the Appellant to request the Adjudicating Authority to consider the pending application while making its decision, thus dismissing the appeal at this stage (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appeal against the non-final order of the Adjudicating Authority should be entertained.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, stating that the order was not final and the application was still pending before the Adjudicating Authority. The Appellant was allowed to request consideration of their application while the matter was being decided.

Law Points

  • Insolvency proceedings
  • Resolution Professional
  • Adjudicating Authority
  • interim applications
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (07) 83

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1132 of 2026

2026-07-02

Justice Ashok Bhushan, Barun Mitra

Mr. Abhishek Anand, Mr. Karan Kohli, Ms. Aparna Bhat, Ms. Karishma Maria

Navneet Kumar Gupta

Evergreens Leisure Club & Resorts LLP

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against an order of the National Company Law Tribunal

Remedy Sought

Resolution Professional sought to challenge the order and requested possession of assets

Filing Reason

To contest the order issued by the Adjudicating Authority regarding an interim application

Previous Decisions

The order was not final and the application was still pending

Issues

Whether the appeal against the non-final order should be entertained

Submissions/Arguments

The Appellant argued that the order was not final and sought possession of assets The Respondent's application was still pending before the Adjudicating Authority

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed on the grounds that the order from the Adjudicating Authority was not final, and the Tribunal emphasized the importance of allowing the Adjudicating Authority to resolve pending applications.

Judgment Excerpts

This appeal has been filed against order dated 07.05.2026 The order passed by the Adjudicating Authority is not a final order We see no reason to entertain this appeal at this stage.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed against an order of the National Company Law Tribunal dated 07.05.2026, concerning an interim application.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Insolvency Case — Upholds Corporate Guarantor's Liability. The court affirmed that a corporate guarantor can be treated as a corporate debtor under the IBC when the principal borrower defaults, regardless of the bo...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Medical Negligence Complaint in Consumer Protection Case — Valid Consent Established.