NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Dismisses Appeal as Withdrawn with Liberty to File Recall Application. The court allowed the Appellant to file a recall application regarding the dismissal of a petition under Section 94(1) of the IBC, emphasizing the procedural rights of the Personal Guarantor.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal by a Personal Guarantor against the dismissal of a petition filed under Section 94(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). The petition, identified as CP (IB) No. 115 of 2025, was dismissed on 06.05.2026 at the request of the Financial Creditor. The Appellant contended that the petition could only be withdrawn at their request, claiming a patent illegality in the dismissal. During the proceedings, the court inquired whether the Appellant had filed a recall application, to which the Appellant's counsel responded negatively. The counsel later requested the court to allow the Appellant to file a recall application to address the grievance. The court, considering this request, dismissed the appeal as withdrawn but granted the Appellant liberty to file a recall application within ten days. The court also requested the Adjudicating Authority to dispose of the recall application expeditiously after hearing the parties involved. The decision emphasized the importance of allowing the Appellant an opportunity to rectify the situation through the proper procedural channel.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Withdrawal of Petition - Dismissal of petition under Section 94(1) of the IBC - The petition was dismissed as withdrawn on the request of the Financial Creditor, which was contested by the Appellant who claimed it could only be withdrawn at their request. The court allowed the Appellant to file a recall application before the Adjudicating Authority, dismissing the appeal as withdrawn but granting liberty to seek redress (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the dismissal of the petition under Section 94(1) of the IBC was valid given the circumstances of withdrawal.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, granting the Appellant liberty to file a recall application before the Adjudicating Authority within ten days. The court requested the Adjudicating Authority to dispose of the recall application expeditiously after hearing the parties.

Law Points

  • Personal Guarantor
  • Withdrawal of Petition
  • Recall Application
  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code
  • 2016
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (07) 30

Comp. App. (AT) (Ins) No. 1206 of 2026

2026-07-30

Justice Mohammad Faiz Alam Khan, Naresh Salecha

Mr. Santosh Kumar

Dharamdas Gurmomal Talreja

Axis Bank Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against dismissal of a petition under the IBC.

Remedy Sought

The Appellant sought to have the dismissal of the petition recalled.

Filing Reason

The petition was dismissed at the request of the Financial Creditor.

Previous Decisions

The petition was dismissed as withdrawn on 06.05.2026.

Issues

Validity of dismissal of petition under Section 94(1) of the IBC Right to file a recall application

Submissions/Arguments

The Appellant argued that the petition could only be withdrawn at their request. The Appellant's counsel requested the court to allow filing of a recall application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the procedural rights of the Appellant to seek a recall of the dismissal order, highlighting the importance of allowing parties to rectify procedural errors.

Judgment Excerpts

The petition was dismissed as withdrawn on the request of the Financial Creditor. The court allowed the Appellant to file a recall application.

Procedural History

The Appellant filed a petition under Section 94(1) of the IBC, which was dismissed as withdrawn on 06.05.2026 at the request of the Financial Creditor.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 94(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Dacoity Case — Conviction Set Aside Due to Identification Issues. The court found that the identification of the appellant was not credible due to the circumstances of the incident and the time lapse before the identi...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Restores Writ Petition Dismissed for Default with Costs. Restoration granted due to satisfactory explanation for counsel's absence at the hearing.