Supreme Court Restores Writ Petition Dismissed for Default with Costs. Restoration granted due to satisfactory explanation for counsel's absence at the hearing.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal from an order of the High Court at Bombay, which affirmed the dismissal of a Writ Petition filed by the Security Printing & Minting Corporation of India Ltd. for default due to the absence of its counsel. The Writ Petition was dismissed because the counsel's clerk failed to attend the hearing. The appellant filed an application for restoration, explaining the circumstances of the absence. The learned Single Judge rejected this application, prompting the appellant to file a Letters Patent Appeal, which was also dismissed. The Supreme Court, upon hearing the arguments, found the reasons for the absence satisfactory and decided to set aside the impugned orders. The court allowed the appeal, restored the writ petition to its original file for a hearing on merits, and imposed a cost of Rs. 20,000 to be paid to the respondents within two months. The court stipulated that if the amount was not paid, the appeal would be dismissed, and the High Court's order would be affirmed. Conversely, if the costs were paid, the writ petition would be heard within three months of the payment. The court made no order as to costs beyond this stipulation.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Restoration of Writ Petition - Grounds for Restoration - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Order IX - The court considered the reasons provided for the absence of counsel during the hearing and found them satisfactory, leading to the restoration of the writ petition. The appeal was allowed, and the writ petition was restored to be heard on merits, subject to payment of costs. Held that the reasons for absence justified restoration (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the application for restoration of the Writ Petition should be granted due to the absence of counsel at the hearing.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned orders, and restored the writ petition to its original file for a hearing on merits, subject to the payment of Rs. 20,000 as costs to the respondents within two months.

Law Points

  • Restoration of Writ Petition
  • Default Dismissal
  • Costs Imposition
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2009 LawText (SC) (12) 64

Civil Appeal No. 8460 of 2009

2009-12-11

Tarun Chatterjee, Surinder Singh Nijjar

Security Printing & Minting Corporation of India Ltd.

The Workmen through the General Secretary & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal regarding the restoration of a writ petition dismissed for default.

Remedy Sought

Restoration of the writ petition to be heard on merits.

Filing Reason

The writ petition was dismissed due to the absence of counsel at the hearing.

Previous Decisions

The writ petition was dismissed by a learned Single Judge and the dismissal was affirmed by a Division Bench.

Issues

Whether the application for restoration of the Writ Petition should be granted due to the absence of counsel at the hearing.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the absence was due to the clerk's oversight. The respondents contended that the dismissal should stand.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found the reasons for the absence of counsel satisfactory, justifying the restoration of the writ petition.

Judgment Excerpts

The learned Single Judge rejected the application. The appeal is allowed and the writ petition is restored to its original file.

Procedural History

The Writ Petition was initially dismissed for default, an application for restoration was rejected, and a Letters Patent Appeal was dismissed before reaching the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order IX
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by Bangalore Development Authority Against Order to Compensate Land Owner for Unauthorized Use. Court Rules That Taking Private Property Without Acquisition Proceedings Violates Constitutional Right Under Arti...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Regarding Employee Transfer Under BIR Act — No Change in Service Conditions Established. Citing the absence of evidence to prove a change in service conditions, the court ruled that the transfer did not require notice...