National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Upholds Appeals in Insolvency Matters — Condonation of Delay Granted. Condonation of Delay Granted in One Appeal, Other Appeals Dismissed for Exceeding Limitation Period.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: CHENNAI
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal dealt with four connected company appeals filed under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, challenging orders from the NCLT, Hyderabad. The appeals were TA (AT) No.176/2021, TA (AT) No.177/2021, TA (AT) No.179/2021, and TA (AT) No.187/2021. The Tribunal considered objections regarding the limitation period for filing the appeals. In TA No.176/2021, the impugned order was passed on 26.02.2019, and the appeal was filed on 12.04.2019, with a delay of 14 days. The Tribunal found that the delay was within the condonable limit and thus the appeal was maintainable. In TA No.187/2021, the appeal was filed on 16.05.2019, and the delay of 11 days was condoned by the Principal Bench, making the appeal maintainable. Conversely, in TA No.179/2021, the appeal was filed on 23.04.2019, but the delay of 19 days exceeded the maximum condonable period, leading to its dismissal. Similarly, in TA No.177/2021, the appeal was filed on 15.04.2019, and the delay was condoned, allowing the appeal to proceed. The Tribunal scheduled further hearings for the maintainable appeals on 17.09.2026.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Limitation Period - Condonation of Delay - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 61(2) - The Tribunal held that the delay in filing the appeal was within the condonable period as per the provisions of the Code, and thus the appeal was maintainable. The delay was attributed to the Registry's computation of limitation from the date the order was made available rather than the date of pronouncement. Held that the appeal was maintainable (Paras 1-3).

B) Insolvency Law - Barred by Limitation - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 61(2) - The appeal was dismissed as it exceeded the maximum condonable period of 15 days, based on the principles laid down in the case of V. Nagarajan. The Tribunal noted that the delay in filing the appeal was not condoned as it surpassed the outer limit of 44 days (Paras 3-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appeals were barred by limitation and if the delay in filing could be condoned.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal condoned the delay in TA No.176/2021 and TA No.177/2021, allowing them to proceed. TA No.187/2021 was maintained due to prior condonation of delay. However, TA No.179/2021 was dismissed for being barred by limitation.

Law Points

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code
  • limitation period
  • condonation of delay
  • maintainability of appeals
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (08) 131

TA (AT) Nos. 176, 177, 179 & 187/2021

2026-09-17

Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma, Jatindranath Swain

Mr. T. Ravichandran, Mr. Malayanur Anil Kumar

VNR Infrastructure Ltd., V N R Infrastructures Limited, V N R Infrastructures Limited, V N R Infrastructures Limited

SS Rail Works Private Limited, Dy. CSTE / Const. & 2 Ors., Rama Raghava Reddy, The Chief Engineer Construction - VIII, North Frontier Railways

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Company appeals challenging orders of NCLT under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought to challenge the orders of NCLT and maintain their appeals.

Filing Reason

Appeals were filed against interlocutory orders in insolvency proceedings.

Previous Decisions

NCLT orders were challenged based on limitation and maintainability.

Issues

Whether the appeals were barred by limitation Whether the delay in filing could be condoned

Submissions/Arguments

Respondent argued that the appeals were barred by limitation. Appellant contended that the delay was within the condonable period.

Ratio Decidendi

The limitation period for filing appeals under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code commences from the date of pronouncement of the order, and delays within the condonable period can be excused based on the circumstances surrounding the filing.

Judgment Excerpts

The delay is condoned and the appeal TA No.176/2021 is held to be maintainable. The appeal is held to be barred by limitation and the same is accordingly dismissed.

Procedural History

The appeals were filed against orders of NCLT in CP(IB) No.12/10/HDB/2017, with various applications for condonation of delay submitted.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 61(2)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against Promotion Cancellation — No Power to Relax Qualifications for Individuals. The court found that the relaxation of qualifications was improperly applied to individuals rather than a class or category, violatin...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Upholds Conviction for Dishonour of Cheques. The High Court's finding of guilt was upheld as the appellant failed to rebut the presumption of consideration under Section 139 of the...