National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Dismisses Appeal Due to Delay in Filing. The Tribunal found that the delay exceeded the maximum condonable period under Section 421 of the Companies Act, 2013.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal filed by Priyanka Uppal against Substratal Solutions Pvt. Ltd. regarding a delay in filing a Company Appeal. The appeal was filed 93 days late, exceeding the maximum condonable delay of 90 days as per the Companies Act, 2013. The appellant had also failed to comply with a previous order to explain the delay by submitting an additional affidavit. The Tribunal noted that the delay in refiling was both unexplained and inordinate, which did not allow for any discretion in condoning the delay. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal due to the inordinate delay in filing and refiling, stating that the law did not permit any exemption beyond the prescribed period. The final decision was to reject the delay condonation application and dismiss the appeal.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Delay in Filing Appeal - Condonation of Delay - Companies Act, 2013, Section 421 - The Tribunal held that the delay of 93 days in filing the appeal exceeded the maximum condonable period of 90 days as prescribed by law, thus the appeal could not be condoned. The Tribunal emphasized that the delay in refiling was unexplained and inordinate, leading to the rejection of the delay condonation application and dismissal of the appeal (Paras 2-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the delay in filing the Company Appeal can be condoned under Section 421 of the Companies Act, 2013.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal dismissed the Company Appeal due to the inordinate delay in filing and refiling, rejecting the delay condonation application.

Law Points

  • Delay in filing appeal
  • Condonation of delay
  • Companies Act provisions
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (08) 82

Company Appeal (AT) No. 192 of 2025 & I.A. No. 4716, 4806 of 2025

2026-08-17

Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma, Arun Baroka, Indevar Pandey

Priyanka Uppal

Substratal Solutions Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the dismissal of a Company Appeal due to delay in filing.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to condone the delay in filing the Company Appeal.

Filing Reason

Delay in filing the Company Appeal and refiling.

Previous Decisions

The Tribunal had previously granted time to explain the delay, which was not complied with.

Issues

Whether the delay in filing the Company Appeal can be condoned under Section 421 of the Companies Act.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued for the condonation of delay. The Tribunal noted the delay exceeded the maximum condonable period.

Ratio Decidendi

The delay in filing an appeal under Section 421 of the Companies Act, 2013 cannot be condoned if it exceeds the maximum limit prescribed by law.

Judgment Excerpts

the Company Appeal suffers from the delay of 93 days in filing the same cannot be condoned under any of the circumstances the delay in refiling is unexplained, besides it happens to be inordinate

Procedural History

The appeal was filed with a delay of 93 days and a delay of 190 days in refiling. The Tribunal had previously granted time to the appellant to explain the delay, which was not complied with.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 2013: Section 421
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Interim Application in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Dispute Over Ownership of Flat and Alleged Forged Power of Attorney. Court Restrains Respondent No.1 from Creating Third-Party Rights Over Flat Pending Trial, Hol...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Contempt Conviction and Directs Reimbursement of Defrauded Purchasers in Delhi Development Authority Land Auction Dispute. DDA's Re-entry Following Builder's Default and Court Order Violations Affirmed Under Contract Terms and C...