NCLAT Dismisses Appeal Against NCLT Order on Resolution Plan Rejection — Liquidation Ordered. The CoC's decision to reject the resolution plan was upheld as it was based on non-compliance with statutory dues under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed against an order by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) dismissing applications related to a resolution plan for Laxmi Precision Screws Limited. The Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) commenced on 18.07.2018, with Mr. Deepak Thakur appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional. The appellant submitted a resolution plan on 12.04.2019, which was approved by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) on 10.04.2019. However, the plan was challenged by workmen due to non-compliance with statutory dues under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The NCLT directed the appellant to address these dues, leading to a revised plan that was ultimately rejected by the CoC on 28.12.2022 for failing to increase its value. The appellant's subsequent applications to set aside this rejection were dismissed by the NCLT on 13.05.2024, which also ordered liquidation of the corporate debtor. The appellant contended that the CoC's rejection was illegal as the resolution plan had been previously approved and argued that the CoC could not change its decision based on subsequent legal developments regarding statutory dues. The court found that the CoC acted within its rights and that the NCLT's dismissal of the applications was justified, emphasizing the non-justiciable nature of the CoC's commercial decisions. The appeal was dismissed, and the order for liquidation was upheld.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Committee of Creditors' Authority - Rejection of Resolution Plan - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 33 - The CoC has the authority to reject a resolution plan even after approval if it deems necessary based on commercial wisdom and changes in law. The court upheld the CoC's decision to reject the plan due to non-compliance with statutory dues, emphasizing the binding nature of the CoC's decisions (Paras 33-41).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Committee of Creditors (CoC) could reject the approved resolution plan based on changes in statutory requirements and whether the Adjudicating Authority erred in dismissing the applications.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal was dismissed, and the order for liquidation was upheld. The NCLT's decision to reject the resolution plan was found to be justified based on the CoC's commercial wisdom and statutory compliance requirements.

Law Points

  • Insolvency Resolution Process
  • Corporate Debtor Liquidation
  • Commercial Wisdom of CoC
  • Binding Nature of Approved Resolution Plans
  • Statutory Dues Compliance
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (08) 47

COMPANY APPEAL (AT) (INS) 1973/2024

2026-08-17

Justice Yogesh Khanna, Mr. Ajai Das Mehrotra

Mr Siddharth Batra, Ms Shivani Chawla, Mr Rhythm Katyal, Mr Chinmay Dubey, Mr Hitesh Sachhar, Ms Anju Jain, Ms Rifat Touhid, Ms Bhawna Prajapati, Mr Shekhar Raj Sharma, Ms Nidhi Narwal, Ms Shristi Jain, Mr Harshat Khar, Mr Praful Jain, Mr Ayuj Aggarwal

M/S Micro Turner

Committee of Creditors

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against NCLT order dismissing applications related to a resolution plan.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to set aside the rejection of the resolution plan and prevent liquidation.

Filing Reason

The CoC rejected the resolution plan citing non-compliance with statutory dues.

Previous Decisions

NCLT had previously approved the resolution plan but later directed revisions based on statutory claims.

Issues

Whether the CoC could reject the approved resolution plan based on changes in statutory requirements. Whether the Adjudicating Authority erred in dismissing the applications.

Submissions/Arguments

The CoC's rejection was illegal as the resolution plan had been previously approved. The CoC could not change its decision based on subsequent legal developments regarding statutory dues.

Ratio Decidendi

The CoC has the authority to reject a resolution plan based on its commercial wisdom, especially in light of statutory compliance issues. The binding nature of approved plans and the limited scope of judicial review in commercial decisions were emphasized.

Judgment Excerpts

The CoC has the authority to reject a resolution plan even after approval if it deems necessary based on commercial wisdom and changes in law. The court upheld the CoC's decision to reject the plan due to non-compliance with statutory dues. The commercial wisdom of CoC and decision of CoC needs to be accepted as far as issues relating to the Resolution Plan is concerned.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed against the NCLT's order dated 13.05.2024, which dismissed applications IA No. 140/2023 and IA No. 280/2023 and directed liquidation of the corporate debtor.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 33
  • Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952:
  • Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Directs Status Quo and Expedited Disposal in Appeal Against Partition Decree. Court accepts undertaking not to execute decree and restrains alienation of suit property pending appeal under Article 227.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Customs Penalty Case — No Evidence of Mens Rea for Penalty Under Section 112 of Customs Act, 1962. CESTAT's finding that the master of the vessel was not liable for penalty as he was not aware of the ...