NCLAT Modifies Order in Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Case — Appellant Seeks Settlement. The court allowed the appellant to file an application under Section 12A of the IBC to facilitate settlement discussions while modifying the order to prevent publication of Form G until the application is disposed of.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by Mrs. Varsha Patel, a suspended director of CMT Mechanised System Pvt. Ltd, against an order dated 25.06.2026 from the NCLT Ahmedabad Bench, which admitted a petition under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) and initiated the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the corporate debtor. The appellant's counsel argued that they had consistently proposed a settlement with the operational creditor and had submitted a repayment plan, which was rejected by the operational creditor. The petition under Section 9 had previously been dismissed in default for non-prosecution but was restored at the appellant's request. The appellant claimed to have paid Rs. 65 lakh to the operational creditor and expressed willingness to deposit the remaining amount in an interest-bearing fixed deposit. The appellant sought to file an application under Section 12A of the IBC to facilitate settlement. The court found it appropriate to modify the order to prevent the publication of Form G by the Committee of Creditors until the application under Section 12A was disposed of, allowing the appellant four weeks to file the application. The appeal was thus disposed of, along with pending applications.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process - Modification of Order - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 12A - The appellant sought to modify the order to prevent publication of Form G until the application under Section 12A is disposed of. The court found it appropriate to allow the appellant to file the application within four weeks and modified the order accordingly. Held that the modification was necessary to facilitate settlement discussions (Paras 4-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the order dated 30.06.2026 should be modified to allow the appellant to file an application under Section 12A of the IBC.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court modified the order dated 30.06.2026 to prevent the publication of Form G until the application under Section 12A is disposed of, allowing the appellant four weeks to file the application.

Law Points

  • Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process
  • Section 9
  • Section 12A
  • repayment plan
  • operational creditor
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (08) 8

Comp. App. (AT) (Ins) No. 1103 of 2026

2026-08-13

Justice Yogesh Khanna, Barun Mitra, Ajai Das Mehrotra

Mr. Rajiv Kumar, Vikrant Yadav, Shambhu Nath Singh, Mr. Sandeep Bajaj, Akshit Awasthi, Mr. Mayank Biyani, Tanishka Kapoor, Mr. Deepak Saxena, Shyam Sarangi

Mrs. Varsha Patel

Alta Performance Materials India LLP & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against an order admitting a petition under the IBC.

Remedy Sought

Modification of the order to allow filing of an application under Section 12A.

Filing Reason

To facilitate settlement discussions with the operational creditor.

Previous Decisions

The petition under Section 9 was previously dismissed in default but restored at the appellant's request.

Issues

Modification of order under IBC Filing application under Section 12A

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant sought to settle with operational creditor and modify the order. Operational creditor objected to the repayment plan.

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the importance of allowing settlement discussions in insolvency proceedings and the necessity of modifying orders to facilitate such discussions.

Judgment Excerpts

This appeal is against an order dated 25.06.2026 passed by the Ld. NCLT. It would be appropriate if the order dated 30.06.2026 is modified.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed against the NCLT's order admitting a petition under Section 9, which had been previously dismissed in default but restored at the appellant's request.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 9, Section 12A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order on Promotion in Departmental Examination Case Due to Malpractice. High Court's Direction to Consider Marks from a Cancelled Examination Found Legally Unsustainable.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Application for Reference in Income Tax Case Involving Government Audit Fees and PF Payments. Government Audit Fees Held Not a Duty, Cess or Tax Under Section 43-B of Income Tax Act, 1961.