National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Dismisses Appeal as Infructuous Due to Withdrawal of Main Petition. Appeal Became Non-Viable Following Withdrawal of the Main Petition Under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: CHENNAI
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by Smt. Kampalapura Narasimaiah Jayalakshmi and others challenging the dismissal of their application to implead themselves in a petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (I & B Code). The appellants claimed to be majority shareholders, while the financial creditor was a minority shareholder. The appeal was filed with a delay of 15 days, for which IA No. 924/2026 was submitted to condone the delay. During the proceedings, it was noted that the main petition, CP(IB) No. 21/BB/2025, had been withdrawn on 05.09.2026. This withdrawal rendered the appeal infructuous, leading the tribunal to dispose of the appeal accordingly without costs. The court's decision emphasized that once the main petition was withdrawn, the basis for the appeal ceased to exist, thus making it non-viable.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Impleadment - Dismissal of Application - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 7 - The appellant sought to implead himself in a petition under Section 7 of the I & B Code, 2016, claiming to be a majority shareholder. The main petition was subsequently withdrawn, rendering the appeal infructuous. Held that the appeal could not proceed further (Paras 1-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appeal challenging the dismissal of the application to implead in a petition under Section 7 of the I & B Code, 2016 is maintainable after the withdrawal of the main petition.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal was disposed of as infructuous due to the withdrawal of the main petition, with no costs awarded.

Law Points

  • Impleadment in insolvency proceedings
  • Withdrawal of application
  • Infructuous appeal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 273

Comp App (AT) (CH) (Ins) No. 319/2026

2026-09-23

Justice N. Seshasayee, Jatindranath Swain

Mr. S. Ravi, Ms. S. Indumathi Ravi, Mr. Gaurav Kumar

Smt. Kampalapura Narasimaiah Jayalakshmi, Sri. Kampalapura Guligowda Krishna, Shri. Krishna Karthik Darshan

M/s. Vistara Media Private Limited, M/s. Mysore Mercantile Company Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against dismissal of application to implead in insolvency proceedings

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought to implead themselves in a petition under the I & B Code

Filing Reason

The appeal was filed challenging the dismissal of their application

Previous Decisions

The main petition under Section 7 of the I & B Code was withdrawn

Issues

Maintainability of appeal after withdrawal of main petition

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants claimed to be majority shareholders Respondents were minority shareholders

Ratio Decidendi

An appeal becomes infructuous when the underlying petition is withdrawn, rendering the appeal non-viable.

Judgment Excerpts

This appeal is filed challenging the order dismissing the application of the appellant to implead himself in a petition under Section 7 of the I & B Code, 2016. the appeal has become infructuous. the appeal is accordingly disposed of as having become infructuous.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed challenging the dismissal of the application to implead, with a delay of 15 days for which IA No. 924/2026 was submitted. The main petition was withdrawn, leading to the appeal being rendered infructuous.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Section 7
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Addresses Delay in Bail Release Due to Procedural Issues. Delay Attributed to Procedural Compliance Rather than Individual Negligence in Bail Order Implementation.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Regarding Land Dispute — No Merit Found in Claims. Shamlat Deh Land Cannot Be Privately Owned.