NCLAT Dismisses Appeals of Personal Guarantors in Insolvency Proceedings — Liability Not Limited. The court upheld the NCLT's finding that the personal guarantors were jointly and severally liable for the entire debt, rejecting their claim of limited liability under the Deed of Guarantee.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved three appeals filed by personal guarantors against an order of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) regarding their liability under a Deed of Guarantee. The appellants contended that their liability was limited to the market value of properties mortgaged as collateral. The NCLT had previously ruled that their liability was not limited, leading to the appeals. The appellants argued that the Deed of Guarantee and related documents indicated a limited liability, while the respondents maintained that the guarantors were jointly and severally liable for the entire debt. The court noted that the issue of limited liability had been previously adjudicated by the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT), which had upheld the full liability of the guarantors. The court found that the appellants had participated in the DRT proceedings and could not claim they were unrepresented. The repayment plan proposed by the guarantors was rejected due to insufficient voting support from creditors. The court emphasized that the statutory majority required for approval of the repayment plan was not achieved, and thus the NCLT's decision to reject the plan was valid. Ultimately, the appeals were dismissed, affirming the NCLT's order and the liability of the guarantors as previously determined.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Personal Guarantee - Extent of Liability - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 114 - The court examined whether the liability of personal guarantors was limited to the market value of mortgaged properties as per the Deed of Guarantee. It held that the Deed's clauses imposed joint and several liability for the full principal sum, and the plea of limited liability was not tenable at this stage (Paras 15-18).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the liability of personal guarantors is limited as per the Deed of Guarantee and whether the repayment plan was validly rejected.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeals were dismissed, and the impugned order of the NCLT was upheld, confirming the personal guarantors' liability for the entire debt as previously adjudicated by the DRT.

Law Points

  • Insolvency proceedings
  • personal guarantee
  • limited liability
  • Deed of Guarantee
  • statutory majority
  • repayment plan
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 144

Company Appeal (AT) (INS) 702/2026, 703/2026, 704/2026

2026-09-21

Justice Yogesh Khanna, Mr. Barun Mitra, Mr. Ajai Das Mehrotra

Mr. Maulin, Mr. Harshit Khare, Mr. Prafull Saini, Mr. Sushil Rao, Mr. Sahil Rao

Bhumika Nilay R. Shah, Nilay R. Shah, Neetima Kad

Prawincharan Prafulcharan Dwary, IDBI Bank Ltd., Bank of Baroda, State Bank of India, Union Bank of India, Bank of India

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeals against the NCLT's order regarding liability under a Deed of Guarantee.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought to limit their liability as personal guarantors.

Filing Reason

Challenging the NCLT's finding of unlimited liability under the Deed of Guarantee.

Previous Decisions

The DRT had previously adjudicated the liability of the guarantors, holding them jointly and severally liable.

Issues

Whether the liability of personal guarantors is limited as per the Deed of Guarantee. Whether the repayment plan was validly rejected due to lack of statutory majority.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that their liability was limited to the market value of mortgaged properties. Respondents contended that the guarantors were jointly and severally liable for the entire debt.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the liability of personal guarantors under the Deed of Guarantee was not limited to the value of mortgaged properties, and the rejection of the repayment plan was valid due to insufficient voting support.

Judgment Excerpts

The plea of limited guarantee does not survive and is not tenable at this stage. The contractual clauses must be read harmoniously. The decision of the CoC in rejecting the repayment plan is binding in law.

Procedural History

The appeals arose from an NCLT order dated 05.03.2026, which allowed applications for discharge filed by the Resolution Professional. The appellants had previously raised similar issues in earlier appeals.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 114
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Partition Suit by Widow in Hindu Joint Family Property — Widow Entitled to Share of Deceased Husband's Interest in Ancestral Property Under Hindu Succession Act, 1956. The court confirmed the concurrent findings of th...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows U.P.S.R.T.C. Appeal in Driver Superannuation Age Dispute — Age of Retirement Held as 58 Years for Drivers Placed in Group C After Pay Revision. The Court held that once the pay scale of drivers was revised to Rs.335 and above, ...