NCLAT Condones Delay in Appeal Filing Due to Sufficient Reasons. Delay of 22 Days in Re-filing Memo of Appeal Justified Under Companies Act, 2013.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an application by G.S. Developers and Contractors Pvt. Ltd. seeking to extend the time granted for curing defects in their Memo of Appeal. The Appellant initially e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 05.07.2026, but the Office identified defects on 21.07.2026 and notified the Appellant. The Appellant subsequently re-filed the Appeal on 19.08.2026. The Tribunal, upon hearing the submissions made by the Appellant's counsel and reviewing the reasons provided in the Interlocutory Application, found the reasons for the delay to be sufficient. Consequently, the Tribunal condoned the delay of 22 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal and directed that the case be listed before the Hon’ble Bench for admission as a fresh case. The order effectively allowed the Appellant to proceed with their appeal despite the initial defects.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Condonation of Delay - Extension of Time for Curing Defects - Companies Act, 2013 - The Appellant sought to extend the time for curing defects in the Memo of Appeal filed electronically. The Tribunal found sufficient reasons for the delay of 22 days in re-filing and condoned the delay, allowing the case to be listed for admission. Held that the delay was justified and the appeal could proceed (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal should be condoned.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal condoned the delay of 22 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal and directed that the case be listed for admission as a fresh case.

Law Points

  • Condonation of delay
  • e-filing procedures
  • defects in appeal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 13

Interlocutory Application No.6358/2026, Un-numbered Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No.___/2026

2026-09-10

Raj Kumar

Jaishree Joshi

G.S. Developers and Contractors Pvt. Ltd.

Paras Nutritions Pvt. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application to extend time for curing defects in an appeal.

Remedy Sought

Extension of time for curing defects in the Memo of Appeal.

Filing Reason

Defects identified in the initial Memo of Appeal.

Issues

Condonation of delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal

Submissions/Arguments

The Appellant provided sufficient reasons for the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal held that sufficient reasons were provided for the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal, justifying the condonation.

Judgment Excerpts

Considering the submissions made on behalf of the Appellant and for the reasons mentioned in the IA, which are found to be sufficient, the delay of 22 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal is hereby condoned.

Procedural History

The Appellant e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 05.07.2026, defects were intimated on 21.07.2026, and the Appeal was re-filed on 19.08.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 2013:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus Against Prison Authorities in Hair Cutting Matter. Court Holds Rule 208 of Tamil Nadu Prison Manual Bars Forced Hair Cutting of Convicts Absent Serious Health Recommendation, and Finds No Com...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declaration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for setting deceased ablaze set aside as dying declaration was not recorded in proper form and prosecution failed to prove guilt be...