NCLAT Condones Delay in Appeal Filing Due to Sufficient Reasons. Delay of 17 Days in Re-filing Memo of Appeal Condoned as Reasons Found Sufficient.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal addressed an application concerning the extension of time for curing defects in a Memo of Appeal filed by Godawri Capital Pvt. Ltd. and another. The Appellants initially e-filed their Memo of Appeal on 19th July 2026. Following scrutiny by the Office on 3rd August 2026, defects were communicated to the Appellants. Subsequently, the Appellants re-filed the Appeal on 27th August 2026. The Tribunal heard the submissions made by the Appellants' counsel and reviewed the Interlocutory Application along with the Office report. The Tribunal found the reasons for the delay of 17 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal to be sufficient and thus condoned the delay. The Tribunal ordered that the case be listed before the Hon’ble Bench for admission as a fresh case. The Interlocutory Application was disposed of with this order.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Condonation of Delay - Extension of Time for Curing Defects - Not mentioned - The Appellants sought to extend the time for curing defects in their Memo of Appeal, which was initially filed electronically. The Tribunal found the reasons provided in the Interlocutory Application sufficient to condone the delay of 17 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal. Held that the delay was condoned and the case was to be listed for admission (fresh case) (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal should be condoned.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal condoned the delay of 17 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal and ordered the case to be listed for admission as a fresh case.

Law Points

  • Condonation of delay
  • e-filing procedures
  • defects in appeal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 10

Interlocutory Application No.6355/2026, Un-numbered Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No.___/2026

2026-09-09

Raj Kumar

Hargun Singh Kalra

Godawri Capital Pvt. Ltd., Anr.

Jalesh Kumar Grover, Resolution Professional for Grandstar Reality Pvt. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application to extend time for curing defects in Memo of Appeal.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought to condone the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal.

Filing Reason

Defects were identified in the initial Memo of Appeal.

Issues

Whether the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal should be condoned.

Submissions/Arguments

The Appellants provided reasons for the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal held that sufficient reasons were provided to justify the condonation of delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal.

Judgment Excerpts

Considering the submissions made on behalf of the Appellants and for the reasons mentioned in the IA, which are found to be sufficient, the delay of 17 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal is hereby condoned.

Procedural History

The Appellants e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 19.07.2026, defects were intimated on 03.08.2026, and the Appeal was re-filed on 27.08.2026.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus Against Prison Authorities in Hair Cutting Matter. Court Holds Rule 208 of Tamil Nadu Prison Manual Bars Forced Hair Cutting of Convicts Absent Serious Health Recommendation, and Finds No Com...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declaration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for setting deceased ablaze set aside as dying declaration was not recorded in proper form and prosecution failed to prove guilt be...