NCLAT Condones Delay in Re-filing Memo of Appeal — Sufficient Reasons Found. Delay of 17 Days in Re-filing Memo of Appeal Condoned Under Procedural Provisions.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an application to extend the time for curing defects in the Memo of Appeal filed by The Indure Private Limited against B.K. Coal Fields Pvt. Ltd. and others. The Appellant initially e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 19.07.2026, but the Office identified defects on 31.07.2026 and notified the Appellant. The Appellant subsequently re-filed the Appeal on 24.08.2026. During the hearing, no representative appeared for the Appellant, while the Respondents' counsel opposed the application for delay in re-filing due to the Appellant's absence. However, the Tribunal reviewed the Interlocutory Application and the Office report, concluding that the reasons provided were sufficient to justify the delay. Consequently, the Tribunal condoned the 17-day delay and directed that the case be listed for admission under the fresh case heading. The Interlocutory Application was thus disposed of with this order.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Condonation of Delay - Extension of Time for Curing Defects - Companies Act, 2013 - The Tribunal condoned a delay of 17 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal after finding sufficient reasons in the Interlocutory Application. The absence of representation for the Appellant did not impede the Tribunal's decision to allow the delay, emphasizing the importance of addressing procedural defects to facilitate justice (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal should be condoned.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal condoned the delay of 17 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal and directed the case to be listed for admission under the fresh case heading.

Law Points

  • Condonation of delay
  • e-filing procedures
  • defects in appeal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 7

Interlocutory Application No.6340/2026, Un-numbered Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No.___/2026

2026-09-08

Raj Kumar

Manvi Jain

The Indure Private Limited

B.K. Coal Fields Pvt. Ltd., Arun Ganjwani & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application for extension of time to cure defects in an appeal.

Remedy Sought

Condonation of delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal.

Filing Reason

Defects identified in the initial Memo of Appeal.

Issues

Condonation of delay in re-filing Procedural compliance in appeals

Submissions/Arguments

Respondents opposed the delay due to absence of Appellant's representation.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal emphasized the importance of allowing procedural compliance to facilitate justice, even in the absence of representation.

Judgment Excerpts

The delay of 17 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal is hereby condoned. None appeared on behalf of the Appellant.

Procedural History

The Appellant e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 19.07.2026, defects were intimated on 31.07.2026, and the Appeal was re-filed on 24.08.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 2013:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Regarding Land Acquisition Compensation Due to Limited Retrospectivity. The amended provision for increased solatium was not intended to apply to all pending proceedings irrespective of the award date under the Land Ac...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Employee in MEPS Act Probation Dispute Due to Valid Appointment and Absence of Termination Grounds. Clear Vacancy and Compliance with Section 9 of Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation A...