NCLAT Condones Delay in Re-filing Memo of Appeal — Sufficient Reasons Established. Delay of 13 Days in Re-filing Memo of Appeal Condoned Under Companies Act, 2013.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The matter before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal involved an application to extend the time granted for curing defects in a Memo of Appeal. The Appellants, Somnath Radhakisan Arote and another, initially e-filed their Memo of Appeal on 22nd July 2026. Following scrutiny by the Office on 10th August 2026, defects were communicated to the Appellants on the same day. The Appellants subsequently re-filed the Appeal on 30th August 2026. During the hearing, the learned Counsel for the Appellants presented their submissions regarding the delay. The Tribunal considered the averments made in the Interlocutory Application and the Office report. It found the reasons for the delay to be sufficient and decided to condone the 13-day delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal. The Tribunal ordered that the case be listed before the Hon’ble Bench under the heading ‘for admission (fresh case)’. The Interlocutory Application was thus disposed of with this order.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Condonation of Delay - Extension of Time for Curing Defects - Companies Act, 2013 - The Appellants sought to extend the time for curing defects in their Memo of Appeal filed electronically. The Tribunal found the reasons provided in the Interlocutory Application sufficient and condoned the delay of 13 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal, allowing the case to be listed for admission (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal should be condoned.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal condoned the delay of 13 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal and ordered the case to be listed for admission.

Law Points

  • Condonation of delay
  • e-filing procedures
  • defects in appeal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 1

Interlocutory Application No.6286/2026, Un-numbered Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No.___/2026

2026-09-08

Raj Kumar

Akash Tripathi

Somnath Radhakisan Arote & Anr.

Atul Tansukhlal Mehta

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application to extend time for curing defects in Memo of Appeal.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought to condone the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal.

Filing Reason

Defects were identified in the initial Memo of Appeal.

Issues

Condonation of delay in re-filing Memo of Appeal

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants provided reasons for the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal held that sufficient reasons were provided for the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal, justifying the condonation.

Judgment Excerpts

Considering the submissions made on behalf of the Appellants and for the reasons mentioned in the IA, which are found to be sufficient, the delay of 13 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal is hereby condoned. With the aforesaid order, this IA stands disposed of.

Procedural History

The Appellants e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 22.07.2026, defects were intimated on 10.08.2026, and the Appeal was re-filed on 30.08.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 2013:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus Against Prison Authorities in Hair Cutting Matter. Court Holds Rule 208 of Tamil Nadu Prison Manual Bars Forced Hair Cutting of Convicts Absent Serious Health Recommendation, and Finds No Com...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declaration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for setting deceased ablaze set aside as dying declaration was not recorded in proper form and prosecution failed to prove guilt be...