Search Results for "emergency treatment"

159 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 159 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Reimbursement Claim Under NHIS 2021 for Aorto Bi-Iliac Bypass Surgery Despite Cashless Denial — Insurance Company and TPA Directed to Pay Rs.2,72,406/- with Interest. Court Held That Denial of Cashless Facility Does Not Extinguish Reimbursement Entitlement Under the Scheme.

The petitioner, P. Ravi, a Head Constable serving in the Tamil Nadu Police Department, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Compensation Award in Medical Negligence Case Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The Court found deficiency in service due to inadequate post-operative monitoring and delayed intervention in treating a patient with aortic aneurysm, leading to death and warranting compensation.

The dispute arose from a complaint filed by the legal heirs of a deceased patient, Dinesh Jaiswal, against Bombay Hospital & Medical Research Centre a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses PIL Seeking National Plan Under Disaster Management Act for COVID-19 Pandemic. Existing National Disaster Management Plan and Funds Held Sufficient for Pandemic Response.

The writ petition was filed as a public interest litigation by the Centre for Public Interest Litigation seeking directions to the Union of India to p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of State of Andhra Pradesh in VAT Classification Dispute. Medical Oxygen IP and Nitrous Oxide IP Held Taxable as Drugs Under Entry 88 of Andhra Pradesh VAT Act at Lower Rate.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals filed by the State of Andhra Pradesh challenging the classification of Medical Oxygen IP and Nitrous Oxide IP ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Strikes Down Rule 19(2) of Bombay Parole and Furlough Rules, 1959 as Unconstitutional — Mandatory One-Year Gap Between Parole Releases Violates Article 14 and 21. Rule 19(2) held arbitrary and irrational for imposing blanket bar without considering individual circumstances.

The petitioner, Kantilal Nandlal Jaiswal, a life convict undergoing sentence for murder under Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC, along with other ...